Re: [Tsvwg] sctp error check

Doug/All:

I will start a straw poll on the poly after the labor
day holiday.. I think to many people are away this week
to get any meaningful indication...

Other comments below..

Douglas Otis wrote:
> 
> Lyndon,
> 
> We can do this one issue at a time or attempt to do a few things in
> parallel.
> 
> I would prefer the (1) CRC-32c, (2) all one's initialization of the CRC, and
> (3) non-inverted store.

Doug, I don't mind 1 or 2... thats fine... As far as 3 goes, all
things on the wire must be in Network byte order...

R

> 
> The other issue that remains open would be the (4) byte order the reflected
> CRC value is stored.  To put this information into the normal order, a
> routine such as flip_ntohl() would need to be added to the library and would
> benefit little endian processors.
> 
> Doug
> 
> > I have no preference on the particular CRC, but I agree with
> > Andreas that we should try to settle this issue.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Lyndon
> >
> > At 03:26 PM 8/29/2001 +0200, Andreas Jungmaier wrote:
> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >Dear all, hi Randy,
> > >
> > > > We, as of now, only need to pick the poly.... for the
> > > > most part I think the only issue is
> > > >
> > > > CRC-32/ITU or CRC-32c
> > > >
> > >
> > >Randy, would you take on another straw poll, in order to
> > >get this (overlong) thread finally settled now ?!
> > >
> > >For the reasons given in the draft
> > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sheinwald-iscsi-crc-00.txt
> > >please count me in favor of *CRC-32-C*
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >Andreas
> > >- --
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tsvwg mailing list
> tsvwg@ietf.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg

-- 
Randall R. Stewart
randall@stewart.chicago.il.us 815-342-5222 (cell phone)

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg