IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7605 (5592)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 05 January 2019 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC426130DEC for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:30:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z007PAD7oxb0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE27130E8A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8117BB81F77; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:30:12 -0800 (PST)
To: touch@isi.edu, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, david.black@emc.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, wes@mti-systems.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: heard@pobox.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190105223012.8117BB81F77@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 14:30:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/HtIaMPIiPzotOryF1nSNmNiC4xg>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7605 (5592)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 22:30:25 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7605,
"Recommendations on Using Assigned Transport Port Numbers".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5592

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com>

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
                                      [RFC1340] also establishes the
   Registered range of 1024-59151, though it notes that it is not
   controlled by the IANA (at that point). 

Corrected Text
--------------
                                      [RFC1340] also established the
   Registered range of 1024-65535, though it noted that it was not
   controlled by the IANA (at that point). 

Notes
-----
RFC 1340 (and RFC 1700, the subsequent and final Assigned Numbers RFC) listed the upper end of the Registered port range as 65535. It was subsequently changed to 49151 by RFC 6335.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7605 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Recommendations on Using Assigned Transport Port Numbers
Publication Date    : August 2015
Author(s)           : J. Touch
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email