[tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-sub-path-ps-00.txt

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Tue, 25 September 2018 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6911274D0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9qsGUOZ8USV for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com (mail-qk1-x744.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDD71277C8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id c13-v6so13820018qkm.4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g0TqH6PNuoUwCBbDiU+IEzdBAqxkllXFmFCX2UAmTNk=; b=ktXLGR4MlHtYZ18D8MlY7EfR0yZZa8Y2t2HnhLI1ye9Z7RXtM8ZSG6UlQs36g/u06B uAEMvCMzcpcibOXMPll2wSs3UVX8K5rI1ELA0spiBeQGhh+P22S1YO8tUN5JarL6AsFu vpG1G/Lx+O3DhtTnqBJIfgQFJJ7VRkrGfDuijXpDXRRUUB6YuGlC9HhudU7H0ImWWA8E M2q+ct78LEKCzqpGBfpa0nZTFXxCvjsEL0pxoOPQXNRulfXTmCb0H4Nu2a4ofjzDASc/ CUB8KqIlEhWzx4Vyx2kebWIVfNkVZT9caYe4sVhr2VqMFH9LMs4c5uLRQZ2fAgQ1eYEN 4glA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g0TqH6PNuoUwCBbDiU+IEzdBAqxkllXFmFCX2UAmTNk=; b=GACVDkcRqGREoLHh1eGqqkPodbf0nXdeQQSvT2ILHFuM0TwSVEs2+VtTe/dU06kLOw sC8CprqrnceF8Wc4/US5CZp7KqQJJvE0hlKn6m5YaLlL0jz8kRliPMZZjpx0/vEYIaeo 6Ejvg6O7X/Yt2AK1Bv14U+XF0mSw5PeLmPISX8WlYSbsoTbAXJ694pWF8LSLMebzShg8 asuu4bUGzTJgHd/kye2NCaWQwyUdukpAspOWIsYKOVE4OeGmEpUuLUiKDl6U2UHfil1j DlJvVBMhI4uu/ZX7K/bSxr06Wlsj0X/2QGvDwZ4ggjublBHU77BFvUcCmaqi9mHz6gz0 tQDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoje7BNvlIEhickRSMiZhJtjoCDyMANTH4Kbo+7UTOBSOdP484hQ 6otCBIpLvxxhzE32j9umIQcd4vx3T23WKo03xm1NJyhA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63IWq1fuY4g4dzrMMUh6QbeK+p9ocuGa4XaVJ6aZTUb1CClw6PL8ig1LiEOZ9M2vyqAQ1jqrl9V4UOSQJRLITs=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a357:: with SMTP id m84-v6mr1569898qke.121.1537897745574; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:ac8:2a94:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:49:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S36MxxSdntos7Za+sZCdubbwv3vGtdFaXAdzFJ-NpHFvRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/I-87sISCA4Khq6kqllNsFN7Za3A>
Subject: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-sub-path-ps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:49:10 -0000

Hello,

I've posted a new draft on sub-path transport layer. The basic idea is
to use tunnels with transport layer mechanisms over sub-paths in a
network that have "interesting" characteristics.

Sub-path transport layer bears a similarity to
draft-pauly-tsvwg-tcp-encapsulation in that in both use encapsulation
that includes transport layer mechanisms, however the motivation is
quite different. In sub-path transport layer, transport semantics in
an encapsulation are the goal. TCP encapsulation could be one
manifestation of a sub-path transport layer, but it's probably too
heavy weight as a general solution (for instance we want reliability
to only best effort in an encapsulation to minimize bad interaction
with higher layer transport).

Comments are appreciated!

Thanks,
Tom

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:06 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-sub-path-ps-00.txt
To: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>



A new version of I-D, draft-herbert-sub-path-ps-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tom Herbert and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-herbert-sub-path-ps
Revision:       00
Title:          Sub-path Transport Layer Problem Statement
Document date:  2018-09-25
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          9
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-herbert-sub-path-ps-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-herbert-sub-path-ps/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbert-sub-path-ps-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-herbert-sub-path-ps


Abstract:
   This document presents the problem statement and use cases for a sub-
   path transport layer. A sub-path is a portion of a network path that
   has localized characteristics that are of interest to an operator to
   manage. The  structure for managing a sub-path is the "sub-path
   transport layer". A sub-path transport layer can provide transport
   layer mechanisms, such as reliability and congestion control, over
   the aggregate of packets traversing the sub-path. Additionally, a
   sub-path transport layer can provide performance measurements of
   traffic over a sub-path which in turn can be input to operations and
   management. The sub-path transport layer implies the possibility that
   traffic may be subject to two transport layer control loops, that of
   the sub-path and that of a higher layer transport protocol, any such
   solution must consider the ramifications of that.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat