IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 01 July 2010 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ECC3A6895; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGd7x5DCM98N; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9353A6850; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.214.235.123] (123.sub-75-214-235.myvzw.com [75.214.235.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o61H1gf8014934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C2CC9F6.8010503@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:01:42 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00
References: <201006302006.WAA26281@TR-Sys.de> <4C2BBEA8.6070904@isi.edu> <4C2CC7C3.2020005@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4C2CC7C3.2020005@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3E0482C82727BB735E186D13"
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alfred � <ah@TR-Sys.de>, tsvwg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports@tools.IETF.ORG
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:02:56 -0000


Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> A point of clarification...
> 
> On 6/30/10 4:01 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> "xmpp" is does not have an Assigned Number, and is not being used 'locally', and
>> was never registered with the SRV registry either. Yes, there appear to be a few
>> other uses of SRV records other than for the kind of services indicated in the
>> IANA ports tale or the SRV registry.
> 
> XMPP does have two registered ports (5222 and 5269)

Agreed - neither is listed as "xmpp", though.

"xmpp-client" and "xmpp-server" are both listed in IANA ports and in the DNS SRV
registry, though.

The point above is about using "xmpp" as the service string.

> but the XMPP WG has
> been waiting for the service registry issue to be settled before adding
> the appropriate service name registration to the IANA considerations for
> draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis, which is currently in WGLC.
> 
> See for instance:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/current/msg00313.html
> 
> Peter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email