[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 17 March 2024 08:16 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB725C1519A0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="Q6zgw4LJ"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="oSu75oOr"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8kdfXxyMRkQ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flow2-smtp.messagingengine.com (flow2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.137]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7CDC1CAF5F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailflow.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CDC20024D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:39:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:39:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1710661191; x=1710668391; bh=BAiPmRh3eVTGCwe17EJMGUQwZfsZPXWcq5d HDXNzf4g=; b=Q6zgw4LJnplCjQNnhOMNljtIXVE80JxJgc2pltaxdpCHJYZAHB6 Nqg6t1HjhKpf1qYYjbtF7nPzBogqMOHpgfqQDd6t9R7Yphhknt0hmMSDAlufaxyk E5JECWhmACswCtuCPhOTRgeG4hQqU2vVglgifUjZEYmGqFTpHaUE3Jt2AWqQyNyC oO5H1SXEJTMKRDfjF+Dc7FZKE5VqZSPSxgBZVVjLc6rahypzXLf8Kgj+yrrL6/qw 1oqTDbfkE8+Q37xgvwMjM9NIifPeIz/hQt5cOzPFWFHZegxJXEqJ+cLCZTT73KZo ZdFIYapdpNMEl+FuALb43rQ1i1SCBpXi1HA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1710661191; x= 1710668391; bh=BAiPmRh3eVTGCwe17EJMGUQwZfsZPXWcq5dHDXNzf4g=; b=o Su75oOrFhqXhnKr6wAmVPOoijx3yCyse8XAuBXH83xTlLGj5IzJCjAsLqizaYYtM 0oJqXFMvqpz+eg8yRMJjx3jMUwjzIXZdJAhjauTRjRJgHJ66c7WKYZFj20TaZyNL uzQY76URhK9IgKle5IgF0hoIgUjx6cFSYxhs7M52XZZ7c3gs801+zlC687ROkqAO wqlA6KvyX1xE8tN6ZnYsonlsB0GfBWyHs9/Ko9/w7CK8lyx8MB4/xXCMSwtknl/P s/vY8d6lQ2HkD+RF4shKEg/rGPAsmTkuJglAfrKpuj7IBwzmU5o4+fHznoKzwyA4 MFvCLeQmXdi2Ed3pAnEYg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:R572ZR5kJEIz9tCKWVQ7JshAIeddrZ7YHIb8lp7Jf2BU49Xjx95emQ> <xme:R572Ze6wD3OSTosl966BYi1w9YifThb-8hgggBkLIAMwwGUz1HaBvCbDiVvyznwQf V95FrN--0mRyzeJvw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:R572ZYeBbI06y9Q_kPVb2C9FBiO1UNIre-VSyidDJTWJZm8Jt2pWTC49_sepUQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrkeefgdduuddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenog frhhhishhhihhnghdqifegvdehqdduuddtucdlfedttddmnecujfgurheptggghffvufes rgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuuf humhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffe etffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplh ihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:R572ZaLc6XLo7UwsJtdGoKOUcWlnA2a_SbYDxISTf_wJFLh7uHQSdQ> <xmx:R572ZVJBaCfDzN_71N0YBnmxwwdFBXRsMgS9Ks-uNFuG7z7zi3ZqeQ> <xmx:R572ZTwYkkbsvDz2BF0Yh9Em6Qm_KWvYSQk5V0BEIURLrvxTy7e3cQ> <xmx:R572ZRLL5x8EQymIcrOWH2S_SWFD-15OYXjaCHWxVzdJL8cAcjrkpA> <xmx:R572ZTga76yykp-TMCicTzhyV69bzzkvFTeW3ZFDbc8WEZMnQyF5UbjxoKs>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 03:39:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0597318798147971491=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240317081621.BE7CDC1CAF5F@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:16:21 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/K-HtGpkn0oKcrY3jW1-BN_80hzE>
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:16:38 -0000
Issues
------
* tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp (+2/-2/💬0)
2 issues created:
- WGLC comments (by markusa)
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/issues/292
- [IANA #1361161] Early review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13 (IETF 119) (by markusa)
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/issues/290
2 issues closed:
- WGLC comments https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/issues/292
- [IANA #1361161] Early review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13 (IETF 119) https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/issues/290
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+2/-0/💬2)
2 issues created:
- CR_Mark is used in the Qlog CDDL (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/26 [Editorial]
- Update labels in CDDL (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/24
1 issues received 2 new comments:
- #24 Update labels in CDDL (2 by TheEnbyperor, gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/24 [bug]
* tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+1/-6/💬27)
1 issues created:
- WGLC issue: Check draft name citation for [To24], rev -31 (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/27 [Editorial]
4 issues received 27 new comments:
- #23 The definition of UNSAFE options should not be limited to options that modify user data (21 by Mike-Heard, gorryfair, jtouch, moeller0, tompandadev)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/23
- #22 NiTs on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-28 (2 by gorryfair, jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/22
- #6 * Section 10.1: UENC downref? (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/6
- #5 Section 9.9: Is AUTH sufficiently mature for LC as PS? (3 by Mike-Heard, gorryfair, jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/5
6 issues closed:
- Section 9.9: Is AUTH sufficiently mature for LC as PS? https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/5
- Processing and requirements of APC and Authentication options https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/21
- * Section 10.1: UENC downref? https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/6
- NiTs on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-28 https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/22
- The definition of UNSAFE options should not be limited to options that modify user data https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/23
- The definition of UNSAFE options should not be limited to options that modify user data https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/23
Pull requests
-------------
* tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp (+2/-2/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Amendments due to the review during the WGLC (by markusa)
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/pull/293
- Clarification of the register to be reserved for the multipath option… (by markusa)
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/pull/291
2 pull requests merged:
- Amendments due to the review during the WGLC
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/pull/293
- Clarification of the register to be reserved for the multipath option…
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/pull/291
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+2/-0/💬1)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Update variables in CDDL (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/25
- Fix NiTS in table (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/23
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #23 Fix NiTS in table (1 by TheEnbyperor)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/23
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp
* https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume
* https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options
- [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group G… Repository Activity Summary Bot