[tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6335 (3814)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 29 November 2013 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA5D1ACCE6 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:47:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1vIAMUyecNbZ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0161ACC82 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0AC28726001; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:46:51 -0800 (PST)
To: michelle.cotton@icann.org, lars.eggert@nokia.com, touch@isi.edu, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, cheshire@apple.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, david.black@emc.com, jmpolk@cisco.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131129184651.0AC28726001@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:46:51 -0800
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6335 (3814)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:47:10 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6335,
"Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6335&eid=3814

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>

Section: 10.3.1

Original Text
-------------
Service codes are assigned on a "first come, first served" basis
according to Section 19.8 of the DCCP specification [RFC4340].


Corrected Text
--------------
Service Codes are generally assigned on a "first come, first
served" basis, according to the rules specified in Section 19.8
of the DCCP specification [RFC4340]. This also defines
exceptions to this policy. [RFC5595] updated the policy
to require Service Codes assignments
in a Standards-Track specification to be assigned from the
Specifications-Required portion of the Service Code registry.


Notes
-----
RFC 6335 should have noted in Section 10.3.1:  Exceptions to the FCFS
policy are documented in RFC 4340. RFC 5595 updated the usage of the SC
values described in RFC 4340.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6335 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry
Publication Date    : August 2011
Author(s)           : M. Cotton, L. Eggert, J. Touch, M. Westerlund, S. Cheshire
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG