IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-source-quench - 18th October 2011,

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Tue, 18 October 2011 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC6721F8B8A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0PplHM-FsJ6L for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D8E21F8B88 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id A1537FED737; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:05:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-source-quench - 18th October 2011,
Message-Id: <20111018120505.A1537FED737@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:05:05 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:05:10 -0000

why does section 6 use SHOULD rather than MUST?

seems to me that there are no known cases where any transport protocol
should ever respond to a Source Quench

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email