Re: WGLC review comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-00.txt

Michael Tüxen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Tue, 24 August 2010 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3823A69FA for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.169
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.869, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_DIP_TDIAL=2.144, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NHSS2ZFph+n5 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3B53A6A01 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.190] (p508FBDB2.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.189.178]) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5EE1C0B461B; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: WGLC review comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-00.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Michael Tüxen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C73D3B3.5050906@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:57:27 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <668A2A52-0A8E-4A47-8E65-D37EEC2CEEA4@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <4C7375F8.1010204@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <D7DE59B5-5F6F-47C3-B0A5-B99E3A7C463F@lurchi.franken.de> <4C73B334.8020907@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CBEBC6EF-2A8F-44DF-963B-BD484A9A5707@fh-muenster.de> <4C73D3B3.5050906@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:56:57 -0000

On Aug 24, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

> This looks fine with me,
Hi Gorry,

OK, then all your points will be addressed in the next revision. I'll wait
until the WG LC ends to see if more issues come up to also address them.

Thanks a lot for your feedback!

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Gorry
> 
> On 24/08/2010 14:35, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>> Understood. Perhaps it would have been more obvious perhaps if you explicitly said mentioned that it replaced section 14.1.
>> Since I want Section 14.1 being replaced by Section 3.1, I'm not saying it in Section 3.1
>> but in Section 3:
>> 
>> 3.  IANA Considerations
>> 
>>    Section 3.1 describes the updated procedure for chunk type
>>    registration and replaces Section 14.1 of [RFC4960].
>> 
>> OK?
> 
>