WGLC ends for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26
"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011F13A6A74 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:00:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uYJIOhxfzRyS for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478C83A6A79 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:00:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=369; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1299006100; x=1300215700; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:mime-version; bh=yRWqioVA1f6T1NtMwY5S2CW09nSlDlHN8uJgFJy1dA8=; b=LyEqbQZumCSSMsP0zNo5b+8f24krlNPObMB6Esj7d1KXEQqNoxyfC+7b RSCp4EbMKv0viHLdaUN0R2SPmRrjuTC1yeGExE3L/xPbgbEKCgezQ/fcb 01SXd2JsnWm++Tvs8lRc3YEkRxR632w7npJqqTcrJO4CMkQd8kGtRMYqi 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEALTRbE2rRN+K/2dsb2JhbACmT3SgT5wbhWEEhRI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,248,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="411516883"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2011 19:01:39 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8711.cisco.com [10.99.80.18]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p21J1dLK016838 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:01:39 GMT
Message-Id: <201103011901.p21J1dLK016838@sj-core-4.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:01:37 -0600
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: WGLC ends for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:00:37 -0000
WG There has been sufficient, albeit late, reviews and comments for the chairs to consider the WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 done. Authors - please incorporate those comments made during into a -27 version and post this version, which the chairs will forward to the ADs for their consideration for RFC publication. James & Gorry TSVWG chairs
- WGLC ends for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 James M. Polk
- Re: WGLC ends for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 Michael Tüxen