Re: [tsvwg] FW: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 29 March 2016 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EA512D991 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: DNS error: query timed out)" header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q3QI6GQhmASI for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AEFA612D98D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7886 invoked by uid 0); 29 Mar 2016 15:51:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2016 15:51:21 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id brrG1s0082SSUrH01rrKdv; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:51:20 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=G/WPTbU5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=7rEblIYDAAAA:8 a=BmY5vwiiFBpJ-P7JTG4A:9 a=WS8VnhCKjB4AQlLh:21 a=t5kw7FLACm2IS0OD:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:References:To:Subject:From; bh=UVfTEh9lbrFtKRlNqe9QvAPr5XUqMaDPx8+B4Z6KENo=; b=rKFxJyxkFIPO4e0wlkNoi+YKM7 2+q8pa/qOU+qS05D41wrVq0Ft0+B7xujOSQKRTYF5dIl+y/iA3Aw5ziCm+4K12ve9JkoNZzx6N49f JhdVRFhq9aov4Iiz4lMtOjaGS;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:56024 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1akvvJ-00078r-9c for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:51:17 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <3359B326-B826-4B18-9DAA-D0E44CE816B4@cisco.com> <A3F25E9C-3FB5-450F-9331-1CE93D4720B5@cisco.com> <feda8cc39fb0edc0f328f4b680370f49.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <aa4e7d4f47c84a578fa790cd55c4930d@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56FAA469.6060607@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:51:05 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aa4e7d4f47c84a578fa790cd55c4930d@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/OVsmxb6XEpRCWLGbQimulZl1iS4>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] FW: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:51:38 -0000

out of curiosity, am I the only one who is still bothered by
labeling/equating DiffServ with QoS (vs Cos)?

Asked another way, does this group still differentiate between QoS and
CoS (service level) as it once did?

Thanks,
Lou

On March 28, 2016 6:38:44 PM "Tim Szigeti (szigeti)" <szigeti@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi TSVWG,
>
> As the majority of clients connecting to IP networks are doing so via 
> WLANs, and since IEEE recommendations for QoS do not align with IETF 
> recommendations, it would be highly beneficial to have an IETF-endorsed 
> reconciliation between IETF IP QoS and IEEE WMM QoS, which is the intent of 
> draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11.
>
> Apple, Cisco and other vendors are all planning on developing solutions in 
> the coming months based on a consistent IETF-ratified set of QoS mappings. 
> If you have stake/opinion/feedback in making sure that QoS is handled 
> correctly at wired/wireless edges, then please read the draft and help us 
> pass this through.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-00
>
> [Otherwise, the only guidance in this area is based on non-IETF 
> recommendations (e.g. GSMA <--> WMM)]
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -tim
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk [mailto:gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:36 AM
> To: Fred Baker (fred)
> Cc: tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Tim Szigeti (szigeti)
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for 
> draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01.txt
>
>
> True. This will appear on the draft agenda. We will need to get some people 
> sufficiently excited to allocate some cycles to read and continue to 
> comment on the draft.
>
> I'm assuming you'll ask for adoption (which seems reasonable). At which 
> point I'll ask who has read or plans to read this? Let's hope the room is 
> not deadly quiet. We'll move on from there.
>
> gorry
>
>> I haven't heard anything from  you...
>>
>> Please consider this a request for an agenda slot.
>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
>>> Subject: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for
>>> draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01.txt
>>> Date: March 15, 2016 at 12:02:20 PM PDT
>>> To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
>>>
>>>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>>> draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01.txt
>>>> Date: March 15, 2016 at 11:28:58 AM PDT
>>>> To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Tim Szigeti <szigeti@cisco.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Fred Baker and posted to the IETF
>>>> repository.
>>>>
>>>> Name:		draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11
>>>> Revision:	01
>>>> Title:		Guidelines for DiffServ to IEEE 802.11 Mapping
>>>> Document date:	2016-03-14
>>>> Group:		Individual Submission
>>>> Pages:		27
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11
>>>> -01.txt
>>>> Status:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11/
>>>> Htmlized:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01
>>>> Diff:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-01
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>  As internet traffic is increasingly sourced-from and destined-to
>>>> wireless endpoints, it is crucial that Quality of Service be aligned
>>>> between wired and wireless networks; however, this is not always the
>>>> case by default.  This is due to the fact that two independent
>>>> standards bodies provide QoS guidance on wired and wireless networks:
>>>>  specifically, the IETF specifies standards and design
>>>> recommendations  for wired IP networks, while a separate and
>>>> autonomous standards-  body, the IEEE, administers the standards for
>>>> wireless 802.11  networks.  The purpose of this document is to
>>>> propose a set  Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) to IEEE
>>>> 802.11 User  Priority (UP) mappings to reconcile the marking
>>>> recommendations  offered by these two standards bodies, and, as
>>>> such, to optimize  wired-and-wireless interconnect QoS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>>>> tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>