[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 14 April 2024 08:41 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336DBC14F697 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="TSpyBKXi"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="ewc7PvuK"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X_lhFH_ufVHK for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E3FC14F61E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DECA1380123 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 04:37:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 14 Apr 2024 04:37:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1713083826; x=1713170226; bh=E+7Q+Be6w1RmBW0pPA/ZLxSxJaZykeLPywM 26Lp+rn8=; b=TSpyBKXiH9Y0P3rdOLsJzMraCSLSRtusAzWBM7z0jpqHeZZvOOo ybst2B+Cjccvxx1Yd9uxJQJ8FU4H9lTc+S51oPxuoyVfZDHfSsIFXaqFBz3VOU57 CuQ8IpS9HQyGpGSA4FXPFOK8IUuARb6cfw7n2QfONw59CrmmnNmZ56Z29nHYInMw lc7feN9Fg7x0Wk99rEqZVtDMeJGLGrYLFmIWtX5KkvACkakichrZU+/1kQQnY9Nv 8UneiASHaWMFsQi4896c+aM5c2CpzPmcmZRIjs0cELX53QhVTgiBuicyq8oAUr5j loV5eHsT9Wly0eNJF4NaWSD9fqA/aYhSPOQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1713083826; x= 1713170226; bh=E+7Q+Be6w1RmBW0pPA/ZLxSxJaZykeLPywM26Lp+rn8=; b=e wc7PvuK8oZoJmQftQykNp2sdQjjp4e5XW9SzyLxw+Q9jC/L0h0nunIOapReBYkQ1 CujTdZrjFjynnl0ckxGV1R9nGI1V25RULejsM/ADffSzmQwEYI79drGcMu+5oGkK Bi0zJqZnNAp1hRJLEajLmFPAJy73WbODMRIHq3JumRrSMUrZ+RAZsNIpVv9w69KJ uKxqmBxJOVYvofVBysRXHHuBLveU9+8PyNaoBfzvezMUrvEVUUQV61A3L6GWGb5+ t2nnUdeWrsIx8n4mNPMGc5tssbBejMiarrTnVFOobl00HzUYMQ54DsdMxyx1cEgK HzPRSsnA+xyxs8qVzW56w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:sZUbZgxTM3Fa2rYKuDATeaBlbAyGbmNuFxAlnkZBgBT4yGV940DZrA> <xme:sZUbZkRAfY68AIORQ029qzn3ZcQUZUK1qSktmKsVOfdQfIPATdAos8ZdS2ZiRVwRe GPyjiLJy6liym3naQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:sZUbZiXNIWEfaZ630Mk2oeoP9kOCrlz0xmDO6rLiUOvapIM8P5P3gGF4HF2gzA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudeiledgtdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:sZUbZugCszIijvSu9sYHp9MHMTIjA_HjP0samA32QARPMbV4mJpGnA> <xmx:sZUbZiBx-IRjf97RyIqS_850n2TgpMZ0E8sG10IaHfbWg4iGl2NZUQ> <xmx:sZUbZvKG0V1TO3Kw_I01oC66GqQb16DHuUFo54748Q9VkbLEOzYuWw> <xmx:sZUbZpByKeeQxmXpgTZ3e-b3YxGpcUgdcJGiCZL1EbmN9GW9aF7k6Q> <xmx:spUbZlOCtGhUWHA_LB1XS15MRVaG81Nm95hFfaRnByLmhs85QoheMMmD>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 04:37:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7565315058169096560=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240414084154.96E3FC14F61E@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:41:54 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Q-KpjYyQmz8ZDjRkfE0PA600Poc>
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:41:59 -0000
Issues ------ * tsvwg/careful-resume (+0/-1/š¬0) 1 issues closed: - Update labels in CDDL https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/24 [bug] * tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+16/-0/š¬2) 16 issues created: - WGLC: Is it OK for the endpoints to send information in UDP options which can be read (only) by the transit nodes and react to it? (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/45 - Various: Commentry on options being opt-in (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/44 - ZS/CMH: Backwards compatibility with UDP (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/43 - GF/CMH/ZS: WGLC Comments - Use cases (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/42 - Tom H: WGLC comments on Appendix A: (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/41 - Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 12: "UNSAFE options are not safe to ignore" (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/40 - Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 11.3: Authentication (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/39 - Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 7: Surplus area (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/38 - Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 7: OCS (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/37 - Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 5 (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/36 - Tom H: WGLC Additions to terminology in Section 3 (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/35 - Tom H: WGLC comments on design of APC and Auth (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/34 - Med: WGLC Minor NiTs (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/33 - Med: WGLC Comments on Magic Number? (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/32 - Med: WGLC Comments on RES/REQ (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/31 - Med: WGLC Comments on Frag (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/30 2 issues received 2 new comments: - #41 Tom H: WGLC comments on Appendix A: (1 by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/41 - #33 Med: WGLC Minor NiTs (1 by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/33 Pull requests ------------- * tsvwg/careful-resume (+2/-4/š¬1) 2 pull requests submitted: - Replaces PR #23 (by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/32 - change new and old key of the cr_phase event to new_phase and old_phase (by hfstco) https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/31 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #23 Fix NiTS in table (1 by gorryfair) https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/23 4 pull requests merged: - change new and old key of the cr_phase event to new_phase and old_phase https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/31 - Update variables in CDDL https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/25 - PR for observe phase https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/30 - Remove editor's to-do marks https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/27 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud * https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp * https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume * https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum * https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops * https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options
- [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group Gā¦ Repository Activity Summary Bot