Re: [tsvwg] The List (of application-layer desired features)

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Wed, 28 August 2013 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBFA21F88A9 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CM6nxIxxuumY for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out2.uio.no (mail-out2.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36DA21F88BA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1VEaee-0006Wh-8i; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:59:04 +0200
Received: from boomerang.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.68.135]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1VEaed-0003XT-PT; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:59:04 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AC5868A3-9012-4B32-9DD9-7310065CEBFB"
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <081D0F76-F4AE-42D5-B354-795BE4910D23@lurchi.franken.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:58:59 +0200
Message-Id: <2ADDC87F-8E20-4D7D-B0A0-20CE3DD12B81@ifi.uio.no>
References: <CAP+FsNeMqB0+igBZjjsT-Xb+17YdUyptBJ2N0x9_jaaLYzKisQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNcvR5q3N2iLv6wM6LQXS72sg1pdvTWdU9rsSFAP8OHpwA@mail.gmail.com> <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC302772111B7D710@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com> <CABaLYCuom7VH+9VJrbe7-D+S7YfGtbS59ne5fG03Zrm=U5tc0Q@mail.gmail.com> <081D0F76-F4AE-42D5-B354-795BE4910D23@lurchi.franken.de>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 6 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 6 sum msgs/h 2 total rcpts 6944 max rcpts/h 40 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.9, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.94, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 994ED6C647D93FC5799AD630002704E7779D2B29
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.68.135 spam_score: -68 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 2766 max/h 16 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] The List (of application-layer desired features)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:59:23 -0000

Hi,

I agree 100% with Michael Tuexen here... just one thing, in line:


>> You're right, SCTP is non-deployable, which makes it a non-starter.  SCTP also does not address handshake issues or TLS issues.
> I agree that SCTP over IP can't be deployed now due to missing NAT support.

Indeed that's not an argument against SCTP/UDP/IP, but I also wonder why, instead of saying "can't be deployed", people don't just go ahead and use it whenever it's there and works, with a fall-back to TCP? This could be done with (this version of) Happy Eyeballs:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-tsvwg-happy-eyeballs-sctp-02

Good reasons against doing this are... what? Anyone?

Cheers,
Michael