Re: TSVWG Status Sept 2011

["James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>]

As an editor of both efforts, I'd say wait for the proposal from me a 
Lou to materialize, then comment on that (thumbs up or down on that), 
then do a review of what the WG is moving forward with.

My co-chair might have a different take though.

James

At 03:44 AM 9/7/2011, Francois Le Faucheur wrote:
>Hi James,
>
>On 7 Sep 2011, at 09:37, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>>
>>draft-ietf-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec
>>      WG interest in this topic recorded at IETF-78.
>>     Charter update would be needed to progress this work.
>>     5 Reviews needed to determine energy/technical direction.
>>     Version -05 (presented in Beijing, IETF-79)
>>     Version -06 (presented in Prague, IETF-80)
>>     RSVP directorate was consulted.
>>        2 reviews from RSVP-DIR received (Bruce Davie, ?).
>>        2 additional reviews promised (Ken Carlberg, Francois LeF).
>
>You have been looking into a potential restructuring of the encoding 
>based on Lou's suggestion. If you're going to do this, I'd rather do 
>the review on the updated document. If not, I can review the current 
>version. I'm not arguing you should, or should not do that change, 
>but can you let us know if/when you see that happening, so I plan 
>the review accordingly?
>
>Thanks
>
>Francois