Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8311 (5399)

[Bob Briscoe <[e-mail]>]

Megan, David,

Completion of the process for this erratum seems to have stalled.

I just followed the link to this erratum 
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=8311> from the tools 
page for RFC8311 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8311>. Its status is 
still only 'Reported'.

The referenced IANA page for the ECN codepoints 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/dscp-registry.xhtml#ecn-field> 
doesn't display the text requested by the erratum (probably 
unsurprising, given the erratum is not approved yet).


A nitty comments about the erratum itself:
     There's an extraneous ')' in the proposed replacement text before 
the '>' at the end of the URL.


Bob



On 26/06/2018 18:03, Megan Ferguson wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks for the reply.  This has been updated.
>
> RFC Editor/mf
>
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Black, David <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> That's ok, given that this errata does result in a modification to an IANA registry.
>>
>> Thanks, --David
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Megan Ferguson [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:23 AM
>>> To: Black, David; Black, David; Spencer Dawkins at IETF; Mirja Kuehlewind
>>> (IETF); Gorry Fairhust; Wesley Eddy
>>> Cc: RFC System; [e-mail]
>>> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8311 (5399)
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> We suggest updating the Type of this errata report from "Editorial" to
>>> "Technical".
>>>
>>> Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/ for further
>>> information.
>>>
>>> If this update is agreeable, we would be happy to edit the report.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> RFC Editor/mf
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 19, 2018, at 2:37 PM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8311,
>>>> "Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN)
>>> Experimentation".
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5399
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Type: Editorial
>>>> Reported by: David Black <[e-mail]>
>>>>
>>>> Section: 7
>>>>
>>>> Original Text
>>>> -------------
>>>> (n/a, this errata adds an additional IANA Consideration)
>>>>
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>> To reflect the experimental use of ECT(1) envisioned by this memo,
>>>> IANA has added the following footnote to the ECN Field registry
>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/
>>>> dscp-registry.xhtml#ecn-field)>:
>>>>
>>>> ECT(1) is for experimental use only [RFC8311, Section 4.2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Notes
>>>> -----
>>>> The Corrected Text is written as if IANA has already added the footnote,
>>> which will be done upon approval of this errata, citing this approved errata as
>>> justification.
>>>> Instructions:
>>>> -------------
>>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> RFC8311 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-08)
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Title               : Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN)
>>> Experimentation
>>>> Publication Date    : January 2018
>>>> Author(s)           : D. Black
>>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>>> Source              : Transport Area Working Group
>>>> Area                : Transport
>>>> Stream              : IETF
>>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>>
>

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/