IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dccp] WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 02 March 2011 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C8D3A6850 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:31:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WEIRD_PORT=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7E2SEZm-l1P for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:31:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23063A6816 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:31:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1355; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1299101576; x=1300311176; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BeihX0V5UAWry86VoxspvDApmLO5BdSRpawk+cguLKA=; b=b8wgdd6DO5AfIpeq9/LgWTsFKTE21lzybr5rvJHbAibSZXVbqW2Tpur5 7w7gHGDzhwABgNyA1VFUU+O68a7p9TFyERZvkOxL69YpK7RHd9KFr6vHt 5zBl6rO/hcXnFlwZ/VLT7xpU7pSDll+o3ubN0xA2q0St5CZtTLdF/0hDP 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAB5Gbk2rRN+K/2dsb2JhbACmcHSidJwChWEEhReHD4NA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,255,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="411783458"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2011 21:32:55 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p22LWsee015021; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:32:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [dccp] WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F4E2D93-F132-4FE8-AF69-8313A0B0BD69@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:35:26 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <640EB785-03DD-41BA-ABB5-C490556C63FB@cisco.com>
References: <9610_1298631433_ZZ0LH600GE26F708.00_9847_1298631427_4D678B03_9847_2510_1_51F3C3D7-3CA1-4A4E-AAF3-A526F253B497@iki.fi> <0F4E2D93-F132-4FE8-AF69-8313A0B0BD69@iki.fi>
To: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:31:50 -0000

I'm wondering what would be the downside of saying the UDP source / dest port had to match the DCCP source and dest port?  This would make it much easier to figure out hot to integrate this into something like ICE or decide what UDP and DCCP ports one uses for a URL like sip:example.com:5060


On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:09 AM, Pasi Sarolahti wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> We just started DCCP WG last call on draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap that specifies UDP encapsulation for DCCP packets (see pointer below). The issue of UDP encapsulation was discussed earlier also on this list, so people might be interested to read the draft. Please send comments to the DCCP mailing list <dccp@ietf.org> by March 11.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> - Pasi
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
>> Date: February 25, 2011 12:56:46 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: 'dccp' working group <dccp@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [dccp] WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This mail starts a working group last call for the UDP encapsulation draft. The draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-06 . Please read the draft and send any comments to the DCCP mailing list.
>> 
>> The WGLC lasts for two weeks, until March 11.
>> 
>> - Pasi
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email