Re: [tsvwg] closing L4S issue #17 on FQ interaction

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBDF120045 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:56:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPA_pdU_0moJ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:56:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D07212001A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:56:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id v201so334536lfa.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:56:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=L3BWd69N/wdub+zRL04E//CzZas2XfPTrSLI1mS+SMg=; b=l/QNmfU8+KzXUEosOxt4BOqgo3wwKs+5luBEcE/rDRkFUlWoZVCW5SwTMIfv8XlGdW tlEQltEbmwp22l6pb3isv32Gptpc7eOoRk9bmX1pDzcEENIPRu7N3/Fz3RFvdizM9HBP 20btBIshQ6+UaP0armL5aFwG85g6JsASZAj7gXGO4LZ2/E93J01G3N7sQcDj1gvMS+Al 5s0mQqn5ANgixRjunkfZf3iPErKtT0s4vi4q58u894zhqbXBaT/HJ2TONA6+47i655ie lVjF2+QiHFB6TSF8XRLV5jVdE0zziuTss5L7AyExWMWnnRtKaKEvTyNaWDoEqCXz2nNH sJQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=L3BWd69N/wdub+zRL04E//CzZas2XfPTrSLI1mS+SMg=; b=Zng4VVBE87xDOCfOPxokmxbItKu/nhKJz9apUtPyHrY+uqtbhe4dvHURRuu1lznmIR ImUCjMBJJXXaHFvE1lsOKOUisXthvIA7SOTvfUmngYmfis5qBICbedjzQkWrgnx6sliy on+GR7RQCy+A49ksrfCwJvbNQfZ2CNgH7bwH/fnRdAXD+7kL0qK4T/lh7uucws11jjkN tIE2yHqVxvzkR601BlgJmN5MzxDCfIOd/P1Zq+yPtRCBBD9ry8uEZf/dy3YJ5oBYvm6z 1qc3D65h9HgQMVJwBj3ky25ELJNdjpr3J9t96NVfWYzgXFJyATW11HyeOndJCBRoSiuA 5ZJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVF64FBURzqzYudQRyRJuq0tBwCe+nkP2bm+tsXTdV9fDAyGldt 3XSPpR6EoCyojWX+lt83IB0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTpuLH5mkP3bueFPekDGz3+yyCN/JtyuXsv4+UTOmEK091PHGziCGJuGOxRKl0vHCwdDH91w==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5196:: with SMTP id u22mr15623504lfi.123.1580871368375; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-229-102-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.229.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm12393303lju.69.2020.02.04.18.56.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <862c1335-1ca7-d82c-3586-8753a18533c0@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 04:56:05 +0200
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E66D0DC-5B53-4F05-BEA4-07AC83DEE18E@gmail.com>
References: <862c1335-1ca7-d82c-3586-8753a18533c0@mti-systems.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Z9rv9DWJFi9A3Qdw9M8X5pqp9ng>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] closing L4S issue #17 on FQ interaction
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 02:56:12 -0000

> On 4 Feb, 2020, at 5:40 pm, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:
> 
> It looks like we have mostly converged on the L4S issue tracker entry for FQ interaction:
> 
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/tsvwg/ticket/17
> 
> Greg's last comment there sums it up well, I think.  Based on the threads and meeting notes, I'm not sure if anything specific needs to be done to the L4S drafts, other than making sure that the TCP Prague discussion there reflects what the testing has revealed is important to be done.
> 
> So, I think when the drafts are updated, we will be able to close this issue.  Please correct if this is wrong.

I have just added https://trac.ietf.org/trac/tsvwg/ticket/17#comment:10 to reflect my thoughts on this issue.

 - Jonathan Morton