RE: WGLC due to end for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying -Please comment to list
"Sheela Rowles (sheela)" <sheela@cisco.com> Tue, 17 August 2010 02:20 UTC
Return-Path: <sheela@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05D93A689C for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P60C8h+ZRrLj for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96C03A6835 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEACaPaUyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACgTHGjepwUhTsEhC2IHg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,379,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="272862263"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2010 02:20:49 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7H2Knph006605 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:20:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-224.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.98]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:20:49 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: WGLC due to end for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying -Please comment to list
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:20:48 -0700
Message-ID: <6B9C4B97B82F924485E26968EB05A6EE0A3F5F03@xmb-sjc-224.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C610560.5030906@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WGLC due to end for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying -Please comment to list
Thread-Index: Acs4YRfdCPsQplboT7Su50pawPhXuQFUZtrQ
References: <4C610560.5030906@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: "Sheela Rowles (sheela)" <sheela@cisco.com>
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Aug 2010 02:20:49.0869 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF20AFD0:01CB3DB2]
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:20:14 -0000
I've gone through the changes and they all seem reasonable to me. Sheela -----Original Message----- From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gorry Fairhurst Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:53 AM To: tsvwg Subject: WGLC due to end for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying -Please comment to list The following draft will soon end a second WGLC. This document was returned to the WG by the IETF with comments, and it would be nice to report back that the updated document has a strong working group support from TSVWG. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying "Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP Security", Michael Behringer, Francois Le Faucheur, Brian Weis, 26-Jun-10, <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-06.txt> There were numerous changes from -05 version, primarily addressing the SecDir review. Feel free to comment on whether the differences seem reasonable and whether the draft is now ready for publication. Best wishes, Gorry & James
- WGLC due to end for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-securit… Gorry Fairhurst
- RE: WGLC due to end for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-sec… Sheela Rowles (sheela)