[tsvwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 10 October 2018 23:51 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext@ietf.org, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, David Black <david.black@dell.com>, tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org, wes@mti-systems.com, tsvwg@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153921550737.5840.5237678645474830105.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:51:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/bgqDoxk_jVEO7brk6UZQsAcQBpI>
Subject: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just a nit:

§3: "The possibility of having feedbacks from receivers(s) is considered out of
scope, although such a mechanism may exist within the application (e.g.,
through RCTP control messages);"

Should RCTP be RTCP?

[tsvwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf… Ben Campbell