[tsvwg] Considerations for assigning new DSCPs
Ana Custura <ana@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sun, 21 February 2021 18:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ana@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B19F3A0E96 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 10:00:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMcJ4Mu9EUPv for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825F3A0E5C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 10:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.22.152.213] (shiftout.plus.com [84.92.41.201]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B5EE1B00257 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:00:41 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ana Custura <ana@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F31F4E96-F5A9-4B88-A3CD-4270059FB900"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Message-Id: <CAACD2A6-EF52-4BFF-A740-D6827C506252@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:00:40 +0000
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/bjoCoc-qcgCYCW1Pjrzkl1ByAYc>
Subject: [tsvwg] Considerations for assigning new DSCPs
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:00:58 -0000
Hi, Gorry and I put together a draft, we think this could provide useful input to new DSCP definitions. We aim to update this over the following months as we start a new set of DSCP transparency measurements across edge networks. Abstract: This document discusses the considerations for assigning new DiffServ Code Points (DCSPs). It considers the common remarking behaviours that the Diffserv field might be subjected to along an Internet path. It also notes some implications of using a specific DSCP. The document can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations/ We’d love any feedback and contributions on this. Ana, Gorry & Raffaello
- [tsvwg] Considerations for assigning new DSCPs Ana Custura
- Re: [tsvwg] Considerations for assigning new DSCPs Ruediger.Geib
- Re: [tsvwg] Considerations for assigning new DSCPs Martin Duke