[tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6458 (6113)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 27 April 2020 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754E53A0CB5; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBhy3IFtAfiN; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 960163A0CB8; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B0DD4F406F7; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: tuexen@fh-muenster.de, randall@lakerest.net, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, ka-cheong.poon@oracle.com, peterlei@cisco.com, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200427222449.B0DD4F406F7@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:24:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/cQp_8Uues1iPcGK-ny1P-cUN-N8>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6458 (6113)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 22:25:12 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6458, "Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6113

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Date Reported: 2020-04-20
Held by: Martin Duke (IESG)

Section: 6.1.1

Original Text
-------------
sac_info:  If sac_state is SCTP_COMM_LOST and an ABORT chunk was
      received for this association, sac_info[] contains the complete
      ABORT chunk as defined in Section 3.3.7 of the SCTP specification
      [RFC4960].

Corrected Text
--------------
sac_info:  If sac_state is SCTP_COMM_LOST or SCTP_CANT_STR_ASSOC and
      an ABORT chunk was received for this association, sac_info[]
      contains the complete ABORT chunk as defined in Section 3.3.7
      of the SCTP specification [RFC4960].

Notes
-----
During association setup, SCTP_CANT_STR_ASSOC is signalled when an ABORT chunk is received. SCTP_COMM_LOST is used after the association has been established.

--------------------------------------
RFC6458 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-32)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
Publication Date    : December 2011
Author(s)           : R. Stewart, M. Tuexen, K. Poon, P. Lei, V. Yasevich
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG