Re: [Tsvwg] TSVWG *rough/draft* minutes
Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Tue, 07 August 2007 11:40 UTC
Return-path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IINPv-000497-8Y; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:40:03 -0400
Received: from tsvwg by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IINPt-000490-Od for tsvwg-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:40:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IINPt-00048j-Ev for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:40:01 -0400
Received: from smtp1.smtp.bt.com ([217.32.164.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IINPr-0005A7-Qg for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:40:01 -0400
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp1.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:39:59 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:39:58 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1186486797396; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:39:57 +0100
Received: from mut.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.87]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l77Bdr1J000757; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:39:57 +0100
Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20070807115230.03d91d68@pop3.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Sender: rbriscoe@pop3.jungle.bt.co.uk
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:39:58 +0100
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] TSVWG *rough/draft* minutes
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-212carcR4ZD00001fe0@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: -1.36 () ALL_TRUSTED
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Aug 2007 11:39:58.0170 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE99ABA0:01C7D8E7]
X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
James, Look fairly accurate to me - thanks. Few gaps filled below: 1/ <draft-polk-tsvwg-signaled-domain-id-00.txt> "*Bob wanted clarification of problem space, is a call a flow? And what happens when one subdomain contacts a node in another domain" [After this pls add:] - Are you interested in policy based on the location of the flow's sender, receiver or either/both?- Flows are between endpoints and they _cross_ network domains. It is always tricky to know if an endpoint is "in" (directly attached to) a remote domain. 2/ <draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-00.txt> "Sally - stated clearly this is not an update to RFC2309 (as ID says)." [Pls remove "(as ID says)" and add:] Bob: The ID doesn't say it updates 2309. That's just something I said in the presentation, which I'm happy to retract. 3/ <draft-floyd-tsvwg-besteffort-00.txt> [Add: ] Tim Shepard: What about where we go from here? What do you propose to do about heavy users? Sally: Network operator is entitled to determine the balance of applications using its network 4/ <draft-briscoe-tsvarea-fair-02.pdf> [Pls add after "very little time to give this preso"] - not intending to replace existing regime, only adding - we've got nothing to stop much more selfish apps evolving - today fairness enforcement all outside IETF - want to reveal an app-neutral metric (congestion) to operators for balancing network usage [Also, at end, pls add:] Bob: Lou Burness volunteered to edit (+co-authors from list) a forward looking informational I-D Cheers Bob At 09:26 02/08/2007, James M. Polk wrote: >TSVWG > >Here is the initial set of meeting minutes from IETF69 (Chicago) > > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07jul/minutes/tsvwg.txt > >I have not incorporated all the minutes sent to me yet, so the minutes >will change over the coming weeks. I wanted to get these out for early >review to help in their refinement. > >Comments are appreciated > > >Cheers, >James >IETF TSVWG co-chair > > *********************************** > "It should NEVER be inconvenient to do the right thing" ____________________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Networks Research Centre, BT Research B54/77 Adastral Park,Martlesham Heath,Ipswich,IP5 3RE,UK. +44 1473 645196
- [Tsvwg] TSVWG *rough/draft* minutes James M. Polk
- Re: [Tsvwg] TSVWG *rough/draft* minutes Bob Briscoe