IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] Confirming TSVWG Hum (IANA Allocation Guidelines ID)

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Tue, 11 March 2008 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1433A6DC7; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7ov-xXwuR+g; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025CD28C19F; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FD63A6D58 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NLwwAEEUQ6X7 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B073A6DA0 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2008 05:03:39 -0700
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2BC3doZ005091 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:03:39 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m2BC3cLh007710 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:03:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:03:38 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:03:14 -0700
Message-ID: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5804D37758@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-RTP-202XsL1c00g00000101@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Tsvwg] Confirming TSVWG Hum (IANA Allocation Guidelines ID)
Thread-Index: AciC4lY8APwdQ2qtRjeamFDWscvkKAAiFn9Q
References: <XFE-RTP-202XsL1c00g00000101@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com>
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2008 12:03:38.0617 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0E46E90:01C8836F]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1337; t=1205237019; x=1206101019; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Anantha=20Ramaiah=20(ananth)=22=20<ananth@cisco .com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Tsvwg]=20Confirming=20TSVWG=20Hum=20(I ANA=20Allocation=20Guidelines=20ID) |Sender:=20; bh=wT+whgXLN9ZrHCAlqFrjYnGgCygRt8f/VJT4KRmkpm4=; b=KKkhjNRgV04PWB6uERYRjK4eq1dNpB+mZw5fZsIfLLxhhhH7FG3jbP9MaD MiutQOX0Pe6ZXuTQpdw3pjeQkko4Q+x46qa5NnF1usYPtfqLnlA89/oB8S05 I2urs+y42R;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=ananth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Confirming TSVWG Hum (IANA Allocation Guidelines ID)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

I gave this document a quick read and have the following comment. 

- Should the title of the document be something like "IANA Allocation
Guidelines for  transport protocols" ?. After all the intention is to
have consistent mechanism (and therefore a single document) for all
transport port allocation requests which the introduction section of the
document already mentions ?

Just to be clear, I do support this document as a WG item.

Thanks,
-Anantha

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of James Polk (jmpolk)
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:04 AM
> To: tsvwg
> Subject: [Tsvwg] Confirming TSVWG Hum (IANA Allocation Guidelines ID)
> 
> TSVWG
> 
> Today, TSVWG heard from Michelle Cotton on the Internet Draft 
> "IANA Allocation Guidelines for TCP and UDP Port Numbers 
> (draft-cotton-tsvwg-iana-ports-00).  This document seems 
> clearly tasked for TSVWG. The WG took a hum to adopt this ID 
> as a TSVWG WG item.
> 
> The room had 100% hum for, 0% hum against, making this ID a WG item.
> 
> Comments in support of, and to the contrary to, this hum are 
> encouraged on the WG list before the WG chairs decide to have 
> the next revision be a WG item.
> 
> James
> TSVWG co-chair
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email