Fwd: [dccp] WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10

Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi> Mon, 02 April 2012 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331F921F866C for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 02:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0levC0WQs8sP for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 02:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-3.hut.fi (smtp-3.hut.fi [130.233.228.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E6321F894F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 02:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) by smtp-3.hut.fi (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q329lVWI012572 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:47:31 +0300
Received: from smtp-3.hut.fi ([130.233.228.93]) by localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08689-45 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:47:31 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.177]) by smtp-3.hut.fi (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q329lL5L012563 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:47:21 +0300
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0910C1E172 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:47:21 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at luuri.netlab.hut.fi
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sfA-KSZy5MYn for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:47:17 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from pc112.netlab.hut.fi (pc112.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.112]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7172C1E155 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:47:17 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Fwd: [dccp] WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:47:19 +0300
References: <20731_1333359735_4F797477_20731_2375_1_EC220417-FEDF-443A-88F1-9DF9CA60158D@iki.fi>
To: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <298D28FE-6A29-4EDF-A34B-49CCF8E47319@iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-TKK-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.1.2-hutcc at katosiko.hut.fi
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:47:36 -0000

Hi,

For information, because this, and similar topics have also been discussed in TSVWG: the DCCP working group has started a new WGLC on draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10. The mail below gives more information. Please send comments to dccp mailing list.

Thanks!

- Pasi


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
> Subject: [dccp] WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10
> Date: April 2, 2012 12:41:46 PM GMT+03:00
> To: DCCP WG <dccp@ietf.org>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As people have noticed, not much has happened in DCCP WG for the several past months. However, we still should finish the last (recently updated) WG document, after which the working group is expected to be done.
> 
> So: this Email starts the working group last call for "Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) Encapsulation for NAT Traversal (DCCP-UDP)" (draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10). The WGLC lasts two weeks and ends on Monday, April 16th. Please send possible comments to the dccp mailing list.
> 
> For the udpencap document the last remaining issue, from the previous WGLC, has related to the text that speaks about negotiating the use of DCCP-UDP encapsulation, particularly in ICE. After discussing this with the authors, we concluded that coming up with a solid negotiation specification would still require significant amount of work and review cycles, and this is not worth delaying the document (and the WG) any further. Therefore, ICE negotiation is left for future work. If there is interest and energy, negotiation can be specified in a separate document, probably in a different working group.
> 
> - Pasi
>