Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1)
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DD73A0D8D for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Anclg0TkXPBw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C103A0D5E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id q14so6123187qtr.9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=AcoKkKShqquuh20bhN7lbZx8XYKI7+ZPfy55hRB/Shw=; b=tnWUiykbNi4H+yjUdBvDCpbG9QIACNSkISOwUSE3WGePYUcASWjJMp3UmwXLaJquV7 jRvJ4tp1OedEYRUtrlvTHfYh8aI8dv3Av8yAtTkBLvkWEsxvwujwL5LnrmKJlWZKVYe3 R2eFlzIQO8O2XKlxJGmarPGyLP/pt8ke+Ogc24MOCOOzcJ1Gcw4FUwvyLpntMJI4m41I YRjCbRKLh/NaI6S/Vp248CcgkkochrpdqWqUa1MaoXMCtEovezylBX3XTo5yLM9yHxYn R4AniRfbao89FZ6lO0KCBZ4LNl3vbQ2Hm2Q0k7HPn7HlVlG+uLMgfVmPCmA5YYdQkX1J bOGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=AcoKkKShqquuh20bhN7lbZx8XYKI7+ZPfy55hRB/Shw=; b=iz5hZQujIN1q/Kc3pE3p4aVE6bDUcQJNVM0k1CCVhZa86p+/+eYtlffiC+l2SPYo/P qPSeT7GjU8tMNlUeDLNfKk9VpOQY7TNyiLCkVb4qJqxCrzQMyy/cGsoPoS9VPv/1kiok wFB07G9rSrM/CYMZvz5E1iGPzv9CijOtNG/0mHyYZcHe+lR5icxn5C5C48q69rCMg3Lk Z3G0HgjsHdvIEwBtgLLiahTNfyfjwP/kznTk7LIMIKO76fXJSAX2P5HogqrqE/XPdwos /yX2Zr8NKqKMZp5RLfkwi4Z35sdnCwMV9Q33pK3nBwFiIgpPqbR5MTKCe/pW61gG4ff3 INbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XKDEhkNVw+RzCgaDmgVGtmO3tia7FQCuAjCj9QewOjkgy3+Ao iQmMGHTwnLu9N6QbKfPa2LqLIr1xKdXmGQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSMjIS77Tio5+Ia+uhivgzoN1j7Qym8mjwSSD8bZW1MgsVt4WZgT9LE1IMUBFlmVb+7ePBkw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4b71:: with SMTP id g17mr4957441qts.187.1591295643285; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (user-12l31c7.cable.mindspring.com. [69.81.133.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h77sm5410865qke.37.2020.06.04.11.34.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <edc73962-eb3f-602d-11c4-b48b181806c6@mti-systems.com> <CAA93jw6As-oqQO=L7Nu8tvg1a1zLE2mSg+vfFwr3koRz6bKGNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <24246b1e-ecb3-fa6a-3277-594f7cab52a3@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 14:33:58 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6As-oqQO=L7Nu8tvg1a1zLE2mSg+vfFwr3koRz6bKGNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/e5i_WZOol5ZRu_4EOUK67gbpY4E>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:34:06 -0000
On 6/4/2020 2:20 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > I did not see consensus. What I saw was the principal inventor of ecn > (kk), the ns3 maintainer, myself and a few others, > calling for more testing. Others on the SCE front, voted for option 2. > > Then there was a bunch of folk that had never participated on this > list before, voting. We don't vote, and there never was a vote. Many people with long histories of participation in this working group and others expressed their positions. Some were sent offlist, which you would not have seen. All 3 co-chairs and the ADs collaborated on evaluating the total set of inputs and deciding how to proceed. This was not done by counting a vote, so there should be no concern about that.
- [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1) Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1) Dave Taht
- Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1) Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1) Dave Taht
- Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1) Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] closed L4S issue #20 on use of ECT(1) Sebastian Moeller