[tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7605 (5592)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 22 March 2019 08:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F96E130EBD; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, L_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uhjzkBNjJmW; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 01:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3438130E8F; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 01:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4B393B81D72; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 01:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: heard@pobox.com, touch@isi.edu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf@kuehlewind.net, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190322083628.4B393B81D72@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 01:36:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/eiq8E3GtwBSD_qpyAyg6idZMevc>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7605 (5592)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:36:39 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7605, "Recommendations on Using Assigned Transport Port Numbers". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5592 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> Date Reported: 2019-01-05 Held by: Mirja Kühlewind (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- [RFC1340] also establishes the Registered range of 1024-59151, though it notes that it is not controlled by the IANA (at that point). Corrected Text -------------- [RFC1340] first indicated the Registered range of 1024-65535. This noted that the range was only recorded (rather than controlled) by IANA. The list provided by [RFC1700] in 1994 remained the standard, until replaced by an online version in 2002 [RFC3232]. At some time after 1994, but before 2000, the Registered range was changed to 1024-49151 and the Dynamic/Private range of 49152-65535 was established, although this change was not recorded in the RFC series until 2011 [RFC6335]. Notes ----- There is an editorial issue as the original text indicated the wrong range with respect to RFC1340. However, the range should not just be updated in the text as there is more history that needs clarification. -------------------------------------- RFC7605 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Recommendations on Using Assigned Transport Port Numbers Publication Date : August 2015 Author(s) : J. Touch Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7605… RFC Errata System