IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] WG Last Call on draft-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-00.txt

Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU> Thu, 13 October 2005 22:54 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQBy6-0001PF-11; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:54:34 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQBy1-0001OJ-QJ for tsvwg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:54:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA25998 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQC8c-0004dt-7J for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:05:27 -0400
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (nak.isi.edu [128.9.168.79]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id j9DMrrO01172; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:53:46 -0700
From: Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU>
To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] WG Last Call on draft-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-00.txt
Message-ID: <4796107B8B456C77DAA5EAAE@nak.isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <A05118C6DF9320488C77F3D5459B17B7013B20DB@xmb-ams-333.emea.cisco.com>
References: <A05118C6DF9320488C77F3D5459B17B7013B20DB@xmb-ams-333.emea.cisco .com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: falk@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

--On October 13, 2005 7:44:44 PM +0200 "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" 
<flefauch@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> As per TSVWG final minutes (available from
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/index.html)
>
> "
> Allison declares enough support to go ahead.  The requirement will
> be a least a couple of RSVP reviewers (from the RSVP team) to
> write during WGLC.
> "
>
> So I believe the agreement was that the "RSVP team" members review would
> happen during the WGLC.

Yes, I see.  Sorry about that.

>
> PS: For one of my other documents (draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-ipsec-01.txt)
> there was indeed a sort of "prerequisite" that some security experts
> review the doc before the WG can moce too far with that document.
> Perhaps this is where the confusion comes from.

Probably.

--aaron




_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email