Re: [tsvwg] L4S work in TSVWG

[John Leslie <[e-mail]>]

Wesley Eddy <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hello, as a co-chair, I'm checking to make sure we have the critical 
> mass to go forward with L4S in TSVWG.

   I'm happy to add my 66 kilograms. ;^)

> Over time, there has been good discussion on this spread across several 
> lists and groups (ICCRG, AQM, TCP-Prague, etc.).  The ADs have asked 
> that going forward TSVWG be the home for this work, so I think we can 
> limit discussion to TSVWG now (assuming relevant parties are on-list).
> 
> The three documents at present around this are:
> 
> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-l4s-arch-00
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-00
> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-02

   Bob has done pretty well on these: I don't want to criticize his work;
but I'd be happy to join in the discussion.

> There was interest in working these in TSVWG at the last IETF meeting 
> (noted in the minutes), and we want that discussion to continue on the 
> mailing list.

   :^)

> Please respond if you're interested in participating in this work by 
> helping to review, analyze, implement, test, simulate, deploy, etc. and 
> agree that TSVWG should add milestones on the L4S problem, based on the 
> current drafts.  Or if you have other thoughts, those would be 
> interesting too.

   I'll do what you tell me to; but my day-job will keep me pretty busy
until February 20.

--
John Leslie <[e-mail]>