[tsvwg] RFC 4594-update revised

James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com> Thu, 07 March 2013 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1061E21F8633 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:17:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.828, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e+-+-TGWB3Mq for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:17:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC15221F84B1 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:17:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1957; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362633421; x=1363843021; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:mime-version; bh=k6t1HnWPo9UHb7ttqlvbxOxlOqQmIxPjtvTAS09KJf0=; b=U61FBfJePtstAyil6n51uE9vpeGXqsx4D8k0TrvqjiHDcwo5dIXJtKH0 daPnJjDMIATd00uiE0v7Xe9hGo2iK2u1kNs5SU1jmhW+bKzLcv50vlY7Z o4MWWGjo4fbDyDA/aTbYzVT7O4It1cXYFbl9XN948/wHYrLaWK45OFeex w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAHYiOFGtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABDxioWc4JqAlYlFR8KYIgKDJlzoU6NW4FOgyoDiGyeT4MogVM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,800,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="184701139"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 05:17:01 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-WS.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8717.cisco.com [10.99.80.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r275H1YU028686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:17:01 GMT
Message-Id: <201303070517.r275H1YU028686@rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:17:01 -0600
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Authenticated-User: jmpolk
Subject: [tsvwg] RFC 4594-update revised
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 05:17:03 -0000

TSVWG

(with my individual hat on)

Apologies for getting this announcement out this late, but this just 
yesterday showed up in the archives - and I didn't want to point to 
something and have 'nothing' appear (other than an error message).

The only thing I changed in this version was add a new section with a 
high level of what I'm proposing needs to be changed in RFC 4594. The 
section is 1.6, and is a page and a half long. It became obvious that 
rewriting RFC 4594 was not only a beast to write but a beast to read.

Comments are encouraged and welcome.

I will be presenting this draft in our Thursday session (3:30-4:30pm).

A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

     Title         : Standard Configuration of DiffServ Service Classes
     Author(s)     : J. Polk
     Filename      : draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update
     Pages         : 74
     Date          : March 5, 2013

    This document describes service classes configured with DiffServ and
    identifies how they are used and how to construct them using
    Differentiated Services Code Points (DSCPs), traffic conditioners,
    Per-Hop Behaviors (PHBs), and Active Queue Management (AQM)
    mechanisms.  There is no intrinsic requirement that particular
    DSCPs, traffic conditioners, PHBs, and AQM be used for a certain
    service class, but for consistent behavior under the same network
    conditions, configuring networks as described here is appropriate.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update-03.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.

<ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update>

James