Re: [tsvwg] Questions about draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon

<Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de> Wed, 21 November 2012 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5021F8667 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:55:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.449, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkkF-CjpBUeX for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F78721F85D2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from he113656.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.99.16]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 21 Nov 2012 08:55:07 +0100
Received: from HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM ([10.134.93.12]) by HE113656.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:55:06 +0100
From: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:55:05 +0100
Thread-Topic: Questions about draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon
Thread-Index: Ac3Ht4a6Pjym/pD4T7aeiC7MeouaDAAA9hyg
Message-ID: <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F5A27E45BD@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E9751EE10@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E9751EE10@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F5A27E45BDHE111643EMEA1CD_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: pierre.levis@orange.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, christian.jacquenet@orange.com
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Questions about draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:55:15 -0000

Dear Med,

thanks for informing me, as I wasn't aware of your work.

I didn't yet read RFC 5160, but hope to do so soon.

draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-profile is close to operations or commercial negotiations. I'm not the one to judge whether the company I work for is interested in standards on that.

Regards,

Rüdiger

________________________________
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:12 AM
To: Geib, Rüdiger
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org; LEVIS Pierre OLNC/OLPS; JACQUENET Christian OLNC/OLN
Subject: Questions about draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon

Dear Ruediger,

I read your draft and I have some questions for clarification:

(1) How to position your proposal with regards to RFC5160 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5160)?

(2) Wouldn't be more appropriate to have a discussion using PDB rather than PHBs when discussing interconnection matters?

(3) Binding two class of services is mainly driven by out-of-band agreements. The document makes use of SLA without having a reference to what may be contained in such agreement. FWIW, we edited a document to help in this area (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-profile-02). Do you see a value in standardizing such profile?


Thanks.

Cheers,
Med