[tsvwg] Fwd: Can DPLPMTUD for UDP Optionsbe considered to be adopted by tsvwg?

["C. M. Heard" <[e-mail]>]

[ resend with working address for Tom Jones ]

I certainly support adoption. There is one substantive issue that I have
noticed:

In Section 3.2.1 (page 4) the draft says:

   Implementations MAY track multiple requests and respond acknowledging
   them with a single packet.


That contradicts the following provision in draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-13:

   >> Except for NOP, each option SHOULD NOT occur more than once in a
   single UDP datagram. If an option other than NOP occurs more than
   once, a receiver MUST interpret only the first instance of that
   option and MUST ignore all others.


This inconsistency must be resolved before this draft (or
draft-udp-options) can progress.

Thanks,

Mike Heard

On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:24 AM Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> We submitted revision -05 of draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud
> a couple of weeks ago. This, like the last rev, was mainly to tidy NiTs.
> The protocol spec has not changed.
>
> The authors are now asking if this can be adopted to progress with UDP
> Options through to RFC publication.  We've asked for this to be added to
> the Agenda for the next Interim, and thoughts from the WG on-list or at
> that meeting will be most welcome!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Tom & Gorry
>
> (as individual document authors).
>
>