IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-02

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Fri, 25 May 2018 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B0312DA1D for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QDvw_VSINbkD for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508C012E051 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD0AF7C6D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 10:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=sasl; bh=C6bn9aoYd049ocYSlmPuFY6FGu8=; b=gdCk5I NN4gTmMN9Xg92zZUeY8UDHFY/n7uP6ML2C5aSeWXTRSDovLUERLXrsaNE62nj5SE LKgWnxeRBg3HL3cBvuA5kJbJwkY7lIzSBjkE6RZcmg9+aLOzTLpEn3LZBZlCAKVv jNbg9wFjJzqzZbTncMCg+5euqGXxGWuHvK9lM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Nu7uCIvCRF9g41xU47vQi2Qxx2KqjWfZ y45AWxYXFlkKNfnbz3ZwJ08NIKZZj2mVekfpuhKhAr9KipiZbmInVHxScARhScPo v+nVeJUiqilGPFa7B+cv1XxeiHAr16mZRf7CaNkMv1A185cUJThDTzrLfh10ybt2 SQIgWTqeO9M=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8148F7C6B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 10:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (unknown [209.85.218.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A46DF7C6A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 10:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e80-v6so4755388oig.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfksNjnCWUxTE0yzw3gEuZhnE0CODVZctuxiAlgZu9OwybCb+Jl QEDRdwb3AaT2cO3fABxV6R0w/siHr5jvRBZXqcE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKL83k1ghM0lqUxT2xvYz/YFNoOMnmqBh8mtsxe6gyyM0T3w1jqQ2kUSBmMIaIHC0WeFFLPDk18UhGPwFyzZVfw=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:917:: with SMTP id 23-v6mr1515368oij.119.1527259010898; Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:88c6:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <143e3d8b4d675e2830a561e5a95fef37@strayalpha.com>
References: <CACL_3VGPVYydSEMiU3jkpDSJ6ps7HZC6uDMd86W9D8RNXtVnsg@mail.gmail.com> <143e3d8b4d675e2830a561e5a95fef37@strayalpha.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 07:36:30 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VGR-FXMOD7p-Opd4w3ZJFtafkS2x_tuLmDKCD2TTMeOPg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VGR-FXMOD7p-Opd4w3ZJFtafkS2x_tuLmDKCD2TTMeOPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Tom Jones <tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d3228f056d08b2f8"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 101E9280-6029-11E8-B8E1-44CE1968708C-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/gwaDnxoHIwU-_J7SyWq8Jph1UaY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-02
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 14:36:55 -0000

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:

> ...
> For 3 bytes or less, "SLIDE"
> For 4 bytes, SLIDE is the same as SWAP
> For more than 4 bytes, SWAP is more efficient than SLIDE (avoids a long
> copy of the data)
>
> I don't think it's bad to have a special case for 3 or fewer bytes.
>

Agreed.

--cmh

>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email