RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc2960-bis-00.txt
john.loughney@nokia.com Thu, 17 May 2001 11:12 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id HAA13584 for <tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:12:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA26091; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA26064 for <tsvwg@ns.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:05:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mgw-x3.nokia.com ([131.228.20.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id HAA13451 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from esvir03nok.nokia.com (esvir03nokt.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.35]) by mgw-x3.nokia.com (Switch-2.1.0/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id f4HB5ev29915 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:05:40 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from esebh24nok.ntc.nokia.com (unverified) by esvir03nok.nokia.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id <T5393766264ac158f23076@esvir03nok.nokia.com>; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:04:54 +0300
Received: by esebh24nok with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78) id <J4KQMGH7>; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:04:54 +0300
Message-ID: <01D91AFB08B6D211BFD00008C7EABAE10680AF8B@eseis04nok>
To: SIGTRAN@STANDARDS.NORTELNETWORKS.COM
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc2960-bis-00.txt
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:04:52 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
Hi Randy, Some non-technical comments about the bis draft. 1) An appendix with what has changed from the RFC would be helpful. 2) Updating author info might be wise. 3) Are we approaching resolution on the checksum issue? I won't ask about IPv6 :) John _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
- [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc2960-bis-0… Internet-Drafts
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc2960-b… john.loughney