[tsvwg] [Errata Rejected] RFC6458 (6081)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 27 April 2020 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318E43A0BCB; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9pnk4WOGYAcq; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C768C3A0BC7; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CB70BF4072C; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: wanglihe@ebupt.com, randall@lakerest.net, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, ka-cheong.poon@oracle.com, peterlei@cisco.com, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200427215328.CB70BF4072C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:53:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/haq8g-xJyApBdmNop9DEp4cojt8>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Rejected] RFC6458 (6081)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 21:53:45 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6458, "Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6081 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: wanglihe <wanglihe@ebupt.com> Date Reported: 2020-04-09 Rejected by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- 8.1.26 must indicate that they are finished sending a particular record by including the SCTP_EOR flag. but I can not find where to use SCTP_EOR flag. because 5.1 The msg_flags are not used when sending a message with sendmsg(). 3.1.4 flags: No new flags are defined for SCTP at this level. See Section 5 for SCTP-specific flags used in the msghdr structure. 4.1.8 same with 3.1.4 9.10, 9.12 flags: The same flags as used by the sendmsg() call flags (e.g., MSG_DONTROUTE). 9.7 flags: The same as sinfo_flags (see Section 5.3.2). 5.3.2 sinfo_flags not mention about it Corrected Text -------------- maybe msg_flags should be used. Notes ----- Another problem is that, I think it should be discuss about debfine a flag like SCTP_BOR for beginning(init chunk) of a Record, because a stream of this socket(assoc) can still be used after send a SCTP_EOR. And between a init chunk and a STCP_EOR, if I change SCTP_EXPLICIT_EOR status, what the socket will send the message? --VERIFIER NOTES-- 6111 addresses the same problem and has a more actionable recommendation. -------------------------------------- RFC6458 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-32) -------------------------------------- Title : Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Publication Date : December 2011 Author(s) : R. Stewart, M. Tuexen, K. Poon, P. Lei, V. Yasevich Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Errata Rejected] RFC6458 (6081) RFC Errata System