[tsvwg] Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-20

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Gory:

Given the number of places in the document that already have 46 (as opposed to TBD), I do not think it is editorial.

Russ


> On Jan 29, 2025, at 11:34 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 27/01/2025 20:16, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
>> Reviewer: Russ Housley
>> Review result: Almost Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft. Please treat these
>> comments just like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-20
>> Reviewer: Russ Housley
>> Review Date: 2025-01-27
>> IETF LC End Date: 2024-10-17
>> IESG Telechat date: 2025-04-03
>> 
>> Summary: Almost Ready
>> 
>> Thank you for addressing my previous comments.
>> 
>> 
>> Major Concerns:
>> 
>> Section 3.2.4: Since none of the Key Types is mandatory-to-implement, it
>> is possible that two implementations of this specification will not
>> interoperate.  I realize that the Key Type have very different security
>> implications.  Also, mandatory-to-implement does not make that Key Type
>> mandatory-to-use. Policy has a role too.
>> 
>> Section 8: The IANA registry indicates that Feature Number 10 was given
>> a temporary assignment.  I expected to see a similar temporary assignment
>> for Option Type 46.  This document seems to depend on that value being
>> assigned by IANA.
>> 
>> 
>> Minor Concerns:
>> 
>> None.
>> 
>> 
>> Nits:
>> 
>> Section 3.11.2: Please add white space between the adjacent paragraphs.
>> 
>> Section 8: s/Sect.  Section 3.1 specifies/Section 3.1 specifies/
>> 
>> 
> Thanks Russ for this review!
> 
> Just one wee update: I think your comment on Section 8 might be only editorial. 
> The WG has already approved this (in Feb 2024), and IANA ha actioned a provisional assignment in the registry:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dccp-parameters/dccp-parameters.xhtml#dccp-parameters-7
> 
> 10	Multipath Capable (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-03-12, expires 2025-03-12)	[RFC-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13 <https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13>]
> I expect the only action could be for the I-D ought to be revised to say that "10" is a provisional allocation.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Gorry
> 
> (TSVWG Co-Chair)
> 
>