Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 October 2007 08:00 UTC

Return-path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhLt-0004Ts-Ol; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:00:33 -0400
Received: from tsvwg by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhLr-0004Rh-Uh for tsvwg-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:00:31 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhLq-0004QV-Cw; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:00:30 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhLp-0000kp-O1; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:00:30 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 32399201D4; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-af833bb0000007e1-26-47146f9dfa7a
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.122]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 0DD0520504; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:00:28 +0200
Received: from [147.214.30.247] ([147.214.30.247]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:00:28 +0200
Message-ID: <47146F9C.1000301@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:00:28 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
References: <E1IcN17-0000Do-JA@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021701060.11358@netcore.fi> <67602DA7-6B73-422C-95D3-7D216E0F388F@g11.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710040933010.965@netcore.fi> <DB07F8FF-D758-4DA5-B5DD-D98556C68421@g11.org.uk> <47055AA3.40605@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <47055AA3.40605@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2007 08:00:28.0856 (UTC) FILETIME=[9DFE5380:01C80FCA]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

My reading of this thread of comments is that there is no reason to
change anything regarding the document. I will therefore progress this
document towards approval.

Regards

Magnus Westerlund

Brian E Carpenter skrev:
> On 2007-10-05 05:38, ken carlberg wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall when was the last (Diffserv-based) QoS talk at NANOG
>>> or similar operator-rich meeting.  (Sure, there is the tutorial, but
>>> it doesn't count.)
>>
>> I would be concerned if outside groups spent time arguing "foo" is
>> bad, or if they advocated other positions to the same issue.  But I
>> tend to feel quite uncomfortable with litmus tests based on inactivity
>> of other groups/people.  My personal view is that advocates of that
>> line of reasoning place a bigger burden on themselves in providing
>> specific in-depth arguments.
>>
>>> Seems like a potential indication that most typical ISPs aren't
>>> working on or interested in this, this stuff is so trivial, or that
>>> coordination is not necessary.
>>
>> i appreciate work that is trivial because its generally simple, easy
>> to accomplish, and leads to fewer interoperability issues.  as for
>> ISPs, its fascinating the disparity of how quiet and talkative they
>> are depending on what side of the NDA you are on :-)
> 
> In any case, if Pekka is correct, that's *exactly* why this
> draft and RFC 4594 are needed - to lay a minimum foundation on which
> ISPs can build operational practices and SLAs.
> 
> It's always been clear to me that voice and video would be the main
> drivers for uptake of diffserv, and Marshall's comments confirm
> that. As that type of traffic grows, ISPs won't have any choice.
> Guidnace from the IETF seems entirely appropriate.
> 
>      Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM/M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------