[tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Registries
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Tue, 26 October 2021 22:29 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E3E3A18EA for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mXsRIga2e542 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x935.google.com (mail-ua1-x935.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::935]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C243D3A18E9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x935.google.com with SMTP id v20so1242186uaj.9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UmSRh+nRySajcFCejIsRnEutgBXPqfWwum2fveKhxdE=; b=RRkwX4q7S4j7MU7YN1nEh1eno7ztKFTBi93dIemvM+nhJh1IkN1KSnF06ANMoO0qMZ MZ4mNVYaDzGD+m0fa6KT18I/6uRy3H1qwtmWs3DnF6UiwWFyLttK5/MDQi+HFWtS4BSx 2Zm5+eWNzGy//YaTINqTL2BUrXzHxzQh1K6WnUwyCIZJd5/aReSjNHcEE6C5gB/bizfx kQchWJK2Wr7+dH277SQU+TR/8FHcpsOYwASg/lDaZHqMHMmrk8i+4Nct/NPeAcbUzZgS S/Y+K20DBS8aS/LIc4y48s7l3dur4PXLa+9Et281bhlUcagTAnZKS7ZeE0sBfm0Ey0tJ htvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UmSRh+nRySajcFCejIsRnEutgBXPqfWwum2fveKhxdE=; b=w5Jb6NrsSeGxGnjNVw6Z/xEDk6VvlUFZn7Iw4bqycyn70CR6wMTZtJMccpfzySvR01 Jq5er1NaxxjPmqMSWN27cZGeArojZ80U7GN0vRVMKPR4pOpI9QvG1GgGYe7PRUfOkrnR eyVjD4ufqtmEaMCAJv6d6Ye3f6JlpN0ok9mAlwzXYlAb24BrQFMvHUxx2PGwACr/WZzn RX4rcySY+psscjXAb9YQ1MjHBKkxYG05PSfvE9dCY8/N9V9DJnNjADOITbTYRdCF/CXe HhrcXy7p7sbiFgkdVc7uuZY/pg52KwKmYIYNXLmhe3+vZpphjXGlKv/Vni7RRrAzv/PE oHkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HaYPfpDnzzM7Nfp2UqIX6iTtoZcUQ66BZCdTQ7ADf7SZIMz9a fiUPKSxnENbfcAFwjyy20FgXJkd2F92m+sPCdMzDN46K
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGJy9ML6OImnkl3hUuEYCTNYEynqox9jDUhORIle9aVG9T8BE4DGMff1NdrPPdmVRgRp+wchDcjX4OJ410s10=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e24c:: with SMTP id w12mr16885010vse.13.1635287343617; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:28:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxS0bkBCHO8TDnUN6tYMnzTpY5hYbWJcOky7SBizajOPKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Cc: Sabrina Tanamal <sabrina.tanamal@iana.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000038d8f205cf49015a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/kRlr68rOOJ9mBYK52bMj_8XglwE>
Subject: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Registries
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:29:09 -0000
In reviewing rfc4960-bis, I noticed that there are no designated experts for the Error Cause Codes registry although "Specification Required" requires it. While we're at it, we should also name DEs for the RFC 4895 HMAC registry. Michael Tuexen, can you also update the draft to indicate that the Payload Protocol Identifiers registry is First Come First Served? (and that the change controller will therefore be the IETF). Any volunteers? Martin
- [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Registri… Martin Duke
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… Randall Stewart
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… Martin Duke
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… John Mattsson
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… John Mattsson
- Re: [tsvwg] Designated Experts for SCTP IANA Regi… Michael Tuexen