AD review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-source-quench

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 19 January 2012 05:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6836F21F84A0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:11:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWemGk+ki+F2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omr10.networksolutionsemail.com (omr10.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7F321F849D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cm-omr9 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr10.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0J5BBmS020712 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:11:13 -0500
Authentication-Results: cm-omr9 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [174.130.101.251] ([174.130.101.251:22202] helo=[192.168.1.102]) by cm-omr9 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 8B/D3-12338-FE5A71F4; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:11:11 -0500
Message-ID: <4F17A5F0.4060502@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:11:12 -0500
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-source-quench
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tsvwg chair <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:11:20 -0000

I think there are two small process-oriented changes that need to be
made to this document prior to the IETF LC.

1 - I don't think it's proper to have a normative reference to RFC
    1016.  This would be a down-ref, and need to be called out that
    way in IETF LC, but I think the right thing to do is to not have
    it as normative in the first place, since not implementing a
    congestion response to SQ doesn't require 1016 (it un-requires
    it!).

2 - I think to make 1016 historic, we need "Obsoletes: 1016" in the
    header.

Otherwise, I think this is ready to go.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems