Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP: new chunks definition

Andrey Konstantinov <avkonst@gmail.com> Mon, 02 March 2009 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <avkonst@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C4928C16C for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:46:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nx+VpGZdAxHP for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f177.google.com (mail-ew0-f177.google.com [209.85.219.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332703A682A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so2018129ewy.37 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:46:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L2TTctsCnN0LtXrFOddGu63bNC2hDhQWt9GKEragDXU=; b=ZnkQqXw6cmY1N8BMx8mwo1UKKJd4HssSRtJQ7tRDo4WzMb61I2QfWmgQge9oJxKSrG kFfMxf0bbqHqBA2TDEoavIprhirFkEXZc9Pex+LqZ2kfT6LKlARvKjgarNmwF3S9kFaV 05PAOv3bUAtDaxcI5Alp2m1eBzxA23SVaEVpM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=epgm4vZEaPuajwNLtWdijgKnL/o6ns3dk+hiL0iHPlS0fZ6XdQ1zU0nKvyMb0WEuaZ nSMZ0X7FLgg+/Jk9MnjL2fRJPfFbbrnttnvNT+nUIiWfjgRWjYeOMu0E/Z06w+9x8XX2 9CaKH3+Xr9RMzmFvRVUMqTy6i/ZXiHfqvkOmg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.17.14 with SMTP id 14mr3468914ebq.40.1236001594508; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:46:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <406B9630-F52C-456A-9062-AB1D2BB65804@lakerest.net>
References: <296afac70903012356y6dd06d13s7a06a75d7dbb5417@mail.gmail.com> <406B9630-F52C-456A-9062-AB1D2BB65804@lakerest.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:46:34 +0300
Message-ID: <296afac70903020546j4cf83fc0o4eb1292dc03f7b4e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrey Konstantinov <avkonst@gmail.com>
To: Randy Stewart <randall@lakerest.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP: new chunks definition
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:46:10 -0000

Hi,

If extend it for V-Tag resetting it could suit...
Thanks, I'll take it into account.

Best regards,
Andrey Konstantinov

2009/3/2 Randy Stewart <randall@lakerest.net>:
> Andrey:
>
> Please go take a close examination of:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctpstrrst-01.txt
>
>
> This already has a mechanism to do some of the things you are
> interested in I think.
>
> R
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Andrey Konstantinov wrote:
>
>> Dear experts,
>>
>> I am looking for the possibility to change local V-Tag of the
>> association in run time without it's restart.
>>
>> The idea of the extension is following:
>> Local SCTP asks remote SCTP to change V-Tag (firstly defined by local
>> side during start-up).
>> I guess new chunk should be defined for this purpose. Remote side
>> changes it and acknowledges the operation with help of another new
>> chunk.
>> INIT and INIT_ACK chunks are extended in order to negotiate support of
>> the feature during start-up.
>>
>> Could you point me out to a RFC or draft if a similar extension of
>> SCTP has been already defined?
>>
>> If I am the first with such type of request could you provide me input
>> information how can we register, develop, review and approve this
>> extension with IETF?
>> The company which will possibly drive the development of the extension
>> is Ericsson and/or Tieto.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Andrey Konstantinov
>>
>
> -----
> Randall Stewart
> randall@lakerest.net
>
>
>
>
>