[tsvwg] RV: New Version Notification for draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-05.txt

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Sat, 13 June 2015 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1E11A9078 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X48HT7TCwBBL for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4BE1A9072 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t5DFPVX8027195; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:25:31 +0200
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <20150613152104.2871.28908.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150613152104.2871.28908.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:25:37 +0200
Message-ID: <000201d0a5ed$32fe4060$98fac120$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQF+gLjLESzSx5AuysSGOmlTUBsmT55O2LMA
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/mw6PtMAm3Nn8BzEnrVmts-2_Xr8>
Subject: [tsvwg] RV: New Version Notification for draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:25:41 -0000

Hi all,

We have also submitted a new version of the "delay limits" draft.

Best regards,

Jose

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Enviado el: sábado, 13 de junio de 2015 17:21
> Para: Mirko Suznjevic; Jose Saldana; Mirko Suznjevic; Jose Saldana
> Asunto: New Version Notification for draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-05.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-05.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Jose Saldana and posted to the IETF
> repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf
> Revision:	05
> Title:		Delay Limits and Multiplexing Policies to be employed with Tunneling
> Compressing and Multiplexing Traffic Flows
> Document date:	2015-06-13
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		18
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-
> 05.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-05
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-05
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document contains recommendations to be taken into account when
>    using methods which optimize bandwidth utilization through Tunneling
>    Compressing and Multiplexing (TCM) traffic flows over a network path.
>    Different multiplexing policies and implementation issues which are
>    service and link specific are discussed.  Additionally, this document
>    describes policies which can be used for detecting, classifying, and
>    choosing the network flows suitable for optimization by using TCM.
>    Finally, recommendations of maximum tolerable delays to be added by
>    optimization techniques are reported.  Recommendations are presented
>    only for network services for which such bandwidth optimization
>    techniques are applicable (i.e., services with low payload to header
>    size ratio, which will also be denoted as "small-packet flows").
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until
> the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat