[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 24 March 2024 08:21 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F98C14F6B9 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="KspaGOk6"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="sycaWG6w"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbNYTWJzDWAt for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wflow7-smtp.messagingengine.com (wflow7-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93475C14F6B4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailflow.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6654C2CC04AD for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:39:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:39:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1711265995; x=1711273195; bh=4TQFXpb8mRZqUnRsx4yArBAOXsA/P7+0Q6X V8RewHRs=; b=KspaGOk6wMnYIJM0kFc/Z/RvCgrO0Nu2MRIHVXyL1SOKwRdX/yg 4EmHvymqxAOaej4KIIZMIL7POHaplv9fjVEJafvOMRMkdrTtcH0uYoMk1oQUHRLb uqJPsIWsqAs736IEd3pDczWyhMDSUiNLViDYggloa9ZtQAW/krk5a4YsNNXUFrcC xGSi1UkAh8i3Kys7TH+duSevPKnWm8WU1KnPbFVzUDHOGYK+QjUCvKCD4Th1uIyB DabH0ap2xxjcxekA6ckwOIABFsL/hggTjxNenNK6O0+jjKFQCRHjVqQ7ytQ1nQoB 42nBGt/edoxrV0OOJXfkcCfHp0QgU5rYBwg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1711265995; x= 1711273195; bh=4TQFXpb8mRZqUnRsx4yArBAOXsA/P7+0Q6XV8RewHRs=; b=s ycaWG6w3hCip0twnxTes8A1gRa4t/X684rMM7FThX+sGezi+QOzktHG/abpy0239 MhmovIaRKzLTT3RE+t2XyGOib3cq2iYDREWuIgWNonLDc8KYBIKv9bJ9yB3HjOTm rVy4rw+vhDrgA9+IAXigpMEmulskXR0RKNK/ZApMm3ohr3OMzZeZagHKK6KKQK0W wi2licamh7oTa1jFkzYodQ2Y+O8wEfYmsAw9xJmR27SP0ljLiieRuYd8vDTjbQmI h8q91wO1UeBmKNSuB8e+PsA2GWyqlSO+ATpXhYwoqkWv8l3T2BPNjarnbIDwPQFX GES6Rjf8W9xBkz2MISCsw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:y9j_ZZTitYq28K1WEzfBWAu73ZUWyD8jLOL_CCfDzsmgEoshh0Vmwg> <xme:y9j_ZSyNaPmu7uPUxutD7Qbtin9KadPTD8ZxsoCPMFZ93Oy0gxaJADueTGANIrgxz Juxl7Dd9dorVuE-QQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:y9j_Ze37SWRXNDQ4hYYGLxupfZ_RFyS_Al_SOPoZQGjBs0i8BeRm2x9g-8C9>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledruddtiedgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenog frhhhishhhihhnghdqifegvdehqdduuddtucdlfedttddmnecujfgurheptggghffvufes rgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuuf humhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffe etffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplh ihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:y9j_ZRCeNjXPFZ_qzBWeOUyfaZUbZXL9L9K73tp96jEvgCQtgksxSw> <xmx:y9j_ZShxR427bZsPkZBIZ1N_khwwKQ8Koa3V1MbQlHGZeVHhqaP5dw> <xmx:y9j_ZVq629isFp1L0ktx4gixanLj8XJsVccF_cTA2GDS5WcLuUuD2w> <xmx:y9j_ZdjFkAiBNnYATuvfXNTQnHS2SY4HRbRpqeOWGGDLnyIgov7cBw> <xmx:y9j_ZWZb3asYQosn57AKc2uCS3uPzI1gCoceVNlEuGWwBNsL1ufv9wBYPbB9xEGU>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:39:55 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5609485868109359387=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240324082119.93475C14F6B4@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:21:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/o2Qb9oremvlnroyph0poJXeQVKU>
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 08:21:24 -0000
Issues
------
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+2/-0/š¬6)
2 issues created:
- Packets vs. bytes? (by joergdeutschmann-i7)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/29
- Per transport or per CC algorithm? (by huitema)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/28
1 issues received 6 new comments:
- #28 Per transport or per CC algorithm? (6 by gorryfair, huitema)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/28
* tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+2/-0/š¬5)
2 issues created:
- Should UDP ExIDs be distinct from TCP ExIDs, or use a common namespace? (by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/29
- IANA evaluation (by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/28
3 issues received 5 new comments:
- #29 Should UDP ExIDs be distinct from TCP ExIDs, or use a common namespace? (2 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/29
- #28 IANA evaluation (1 by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/28
- #27 WGLC issue: Check draft name citation for [To24], rev -31 (2 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/27 [Editorial]
Pull requests
-------------
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+1/-0/š¬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Remove editor's to-do marks (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/27
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp
* https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume
* https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options
- [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group Gā¦ Repository Activity Summary Bot