[tsvwg] New version of the TCM drafts

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Thu, 11 December 2014 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66151ACDB4 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:01:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6M4mM6dN_WnN for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B401ACDA9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id sBBA1823009309; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:01:16 +0100
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:01:15 +0100
Message-ID: <00e401d01529$6bbdfd00$4339f700$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E5_01D01531.CD83EBA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdAVKKgS1VddqZ9PR8+NJ74v6qx/Sw==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/o5pfp7AoAWGSKTFiij_pL6Jhc1c
Cc: 'Gorry Fairhurst' <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, 'David Flórez Rodríguez' <david.florezrodriguez@telefonica.com>, 'Manuel Núñez Sanz' <manuel.nunezsanz@telefonica.com>, 'Juan Antonio Castell Lucía' <juanantonio.castelllucia@telefonica.com>, 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Fernando Pascual Blanco' <fernando.pascualblanco@telefonica.com>, "'Dan Wing (dwing)'" <dwing@cisco.com>, "'Michael Ramalho (mramalho)'" <mramalho@cisco.com>
Subject: [tsvwg] New version of the TCM drafts
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:01:47 -0000

Hi all,
 
We have just submitted new versions of the two TCM drafts:
 
- Tunneling Compressing and Multiplexing (TCM) Traffic Flows. Reference Model. draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf-08
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf/
 
- Delay Limits and Multiplexing Policies to be employed with Tunneling Compressing and Multiplexing Traffic Flows. draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-04
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf/
 
In addition, yesterday I submitted another draft about Simplemux (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-tsvwg-simplemux/), a multiplexing protocol simpler than PPPMux (I will send another e-mail explaining it).
 
We have built an implementation of TCM over Simplemux (https://github.com/TCM-TF/simplemux), and we will soon report the results of some tests we are planning.
 
Best regards,
 
Jose Saldana
PS: These are some of the improvements:
- keywords have been added
    multiplexing
    header compression
    optimization
    small-packet flows
 
- We talk about “Tunneling, Compressing and Multiplexing (TCM)” instead of “Tunneling Compressed and Multiplexed Traffic Flows (TCM-TF)”. It is a bit confusing if we talk about TCM in some places and TCM-TF in others. In addition, TCM is very easy to remember.
 
- We have improved the abstract and the introduction, talking about “optimization”, “small-packet flows” here and there.
 
- We have updated the reference to COAP (it is now an RFC and it was a draft some months ago).
 
- We have added a reference for supporting the statement saying that routers have a limit in the number of pps they can manage.
 
- We have modified the titles of some subsections.