IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] sce vs l4s comparison plots?

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Tue, 12 November 2019 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0313D12008B; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:24:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3l8wKSIxqWZD; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a00:7660:6da:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F3312004A; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:24:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1573575883; bh=W714BWwW+3W282M4b1ylMXhTssdEyOFiW+GfVkIg8J4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=yGYVI8bFS76yL34AnhqIqiSrmd5f5Jomq/ctXszXHGz0XLanp2uRe7yiXzWpbbT+o WlGan0WogcsduXHO7WOscs0hBmLMB8Fs1gJFuQpp5EFOr039MiO/54QjzPJO7Lg9aM Vt/ly2OmBUr84bCpXnR5S6Akqfa0awH7tonnNYz0c7RgZz230Mxc9WY6Q0QwAjcqD1 vsDrOQNgWT4wnskjTT1G59IT38Y+4bVOW0XMgofHGGMfBiMRWptWLtIbxAoFupfLVR r3IR2To1Ley0/QxqTopYHADkqT2BZceOuSkbBZrFMRcluBn897XB42AwbfhTkEgOrH 8PcfiKo9GeHrg==
To: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1573572813.20182.3.camel@petri-meat.com>
References: <742142FB-6233-4048-931B-EE2DD9024454@gmx.de> <87mud4ejl9.fsf@taht.net> <4b67d594-e4fc-92d8-fcdc-8384fcb7286b@tomh.org> <87a7931d1k.fsf@taht.net> <1369738724.1583995.1573472465758@mail.yahoo.com> <87k186z2wr.fsf@taht.net> <1573572813.20182.3.camel@petri-meat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:24:42 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87eeydoyet.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/qXngSioewKOAkwzLTbj2pGYlIrg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] sce vs l4s comparison plots?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:24:48 -0000

Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com> writes:

> On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 10:25 -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> Given that a lot of stuff has moved to a purer software solution,
>> slicing, sdn, etc, including switching, I can imagine this would
>> move more into software, also - if folk were still producing new
>> dsl gear.
>> 
>> One thing that has always been unclear to me is where
>> dsl subscriber software rate limits are enforced. 
>
> In the BRAS.

Heh. In Danish, 'bras' literally means 'junk'. I'm sure that's just a
coincidence :)

-Toke

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email