[Tsvwg] Comments on the Usefulness of Simple Best-Effort Traffic

Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com> Tue, 15 January 2008 06:14 UTC

Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <856a2a016213c34da927b175735a80af@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
To: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:14:28 -0800
Subject: [Tsvwg] Comments on the Usefulness of Simple Best-Effort Traffic
Precedence: list
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Mark Allman and I just submitted a slightly-revised version of
our draft, draft-floyd-tsvwg-besteffort, on "Comments on the
Usefulness of Simple Best-Effort Traffic".  The changes were
quite minor.

It is available from:

   http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers/draft-floyd-tsvwg-besteffort-02.txt
   http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers/draft-floyd-tsvwg-besteffort-02.pdf

and by tomorrow it will probably be available at:

   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-floyd-tsvwg-besteffort

This draft is targeted as an individual submission, but before
submitting it to the RFC editor, we thought we would send
email to the working group to see if anyone has any changes
to suggest.  (We presented this at the July IETF, but since
it is targeted as an individual submission, it doesn't require
any form of consensus, rough or otherwise.)

We plan to sent it in the RFC editor in two weeks, on
January 28.

Many thanks,

- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/

[Tsvwg] Comments on the Usefulness of Simple Best… Sally Floyd
[Tsvwg] Comments on the Usefulness of Simple Best… Sally Floyd