[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 10 March 2024 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66734C14E515 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:46:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="TXynanrq"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="gczg+7P5"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SieDTd_GYsn for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wflow6-smtp.messagingengine.com (wflow6-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.141]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE66C14F61F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailflow.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B537D2CC030B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:40:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:40:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1710056412; x=1710063612; bh=ucfSEb8PJCwjfn2ozwH8H7NVvhtV+eWLCZa ITsVoFaw=; b=TXynanrqxLDGGJKMkR2bXPGJXNzVF/I+s9XcONgHpz0mXC1DmPg Vug01QehQ05nk+UNN4ttsQSyAmsyLJwdEhPzkBXBHtBnhMXJMIwAchepQlsa/luB obxPBNuvDtKOUSObt+LailOSCN+i5TjNGbZMSYPNySwQq5Rh2fmZ05IgaYS+ZCvK Sa4JBsryHAFpKYFBFtQcHhnz32AV/MHVyKPjIgU4WXigwgTMYaDrHDAgeQH3aJLR qw8IDGHd6oTRNhuqTDymLBTK965gSvmA/JjSk6gTtaG6ODAbDw8BBhyl72VmFpCs rrMUIcpTj3JdxLNrJ1eml0a0pNgvm5mXcaw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1710056412; x= 1710063612; bh=ucfSEb8PJCwjfn2ozwH8H7NVvhtV+eWLCZaITsVoFaw=; b=g czg+7P5VmTDRPb6BlPBcUzA9aXymF0YpcL/gDR+WkQzvkuW5IBADo/MCq1naRU95 NxQX015nz5/LMt/wKdgoUa7vEKHMJKwHigrWXHRPRE1gIjFlO1m4nzAyE5cYTYuP nl9genZTu4ZXDHsg6VjNKaHpwnsCbjd8dWiOWHSgoT/swTbVJJHs9WhNFXgu63xI VkhYnUdavU6fSA2MjbVEchTwm07iR/oRO3NeCy2/EXVzo6agHgYpV1MVJANsBwo2 1MSX/gXuQ/a1E9uQlOaLGeac4eekCfMGNuNeuRN4m720swWokfB/oS1QpRAmu1fg T7g6J4ZTcyvQ/dy2fI87g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:3GPtZa-h_O_82n5rWm8qt-hSJeNj4e8g8qrUOOdQSBBUAgjaP2wjiQ> <xme:3GPtZastHj9Tq7vwIoQ4QveV4Umq7o_DPb1NVSdelKE2FPDb4UngItGB27V7MlToC U18fAGEpt5L2bo8HQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:3GPtZQBs5VdUcTwnQIWrp7uSpKM7lwNuCRix6McQBA9h2jxSVuFQbEmTvnnUJxZKdePMr7ErQOL0K-ptcExz0D3YSm73ynZqLnYabBQaoZuyaUTlA2J_ox_mMzd9R-k-8qadukY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrieekgdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenog frhhhishhhihhnghdqifegvdehqdduuddtucdlfedttddmnecujfgurheptggghffvufes rgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuuf humhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffe etffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplh ihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:3GPtZSdommCdlQddoQbt7-9w3F59FYc2UishHk6o7vej43c4KTqDcQ> <xmx:3GPtZfMmie29WOmEPZU_yl61ZsXk4T0hQVc6qB46UKWAF_tcwWzMYA> <xmx:3GPtZcmDTn9O-brvPE2vU5U9nOA1uRojd1Snz67mxeZ9PmD89Q53mQ> <xmx:3GPtZRUJ9JaVts3W9mqqDpisVg-HrivdiQczyRqXqldvSsb3KwSQevcDlaoG9bhk>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:40:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8592673127517207999=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240310074617.DCE66C14F61F@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 23:46:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/uXifFg7Wk1KtszQ2bFXoD2L5jzs>
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 07:46:22 -0000



Issues
------
* tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+0/-4/💬29)
  6 issues received 29 new comments:
  - #26 Address IPv6 jumbo grams (3 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/26 
  - #25 Reduce reduce implementation complexity by limiting per-fragment options to specific ones and fixing per-fragment option placement (3 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/25 
  - #24 The API extensions for UDP Options must allow UDP fragmentation to be on or off for any send request (4 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/24 
  - #23 The definition of UNSAFE options should not be limited to options that modify user data (16 by Mike-Heard, jtouch, tompandadev)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/23 
  - #22 NiTs on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-28 (1 by Mike-Heard)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/22 
  - #21 Processing and requirements of APC and Authentication options (2 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/21 

  4 issues closed:
  - The definition of UNSAFE options should not be limited to options that modify user data https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/23 
  - Reduce reduce implementation complexity by limiting per-fragment options to specific ones and fixing per-fragment option placement https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/25 
  - Address IPv6 jumbo grams https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/26 
  - The API extensions for UDP Options must allow UDP fragmentation to be on or off for any send request https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/24 




Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp
* https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume
* https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options