[tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6458 (4921)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 27 April 2020 20:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D573A0A50; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQ_h8tQnEaDn; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 519333A087F; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7A5D4F4070D; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: jtleight@udel.edu, randall@lakerest.net, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, ka-cheong.poon@oracle.com, peterlei@cisco.com, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200427204504.7A5D4F4070D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:45:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/vp8sP8P6Lqhoopk77CeCQ3nkoDA>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6458 (4921)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:45:35 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6458, "Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4921 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Jonathan Leighton <jtleight@udel.edu> Date Reported: 2017-02-02 Held by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: 9.1 Original Text ------------- If sd is an IPv4 socket, the addresses passed must be IPv4 addresses. If the sd is an IPv6 socket, the addresses passed can either be IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. Corrected Text -------------- If sd is an IPv4 socket, the passed addresses must be IPv4 addresses. If sd is an IPv6 socket, the passed addresses must be IPv6 addresses. Use IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses to bind an IPv6 socket to an IPv4 address. Note that some implementations optionally allow IPv4 addresses to be passed in directly. Notes ----- The erratum is a subtle change in meaning that would be a useful clarification. -------------------------------------- RFC6458 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-32) -------------------------------------- Title : Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Publication Date : December 2011 Author(s) : R. Stewart, M. Tuexen, K. Poon, P. Lei, V. Yasevich Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6458… RFC Errata System