Re: [tsvwg] Attendance in Hiroshima for TSVWG?

Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com> Thu, 08 October 2009 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F50F3A6897 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.583, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NHSVpDQcihaB for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA043A6800 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=flefauch@cisco.com; l=612; q=dns/txt; s=amsiport01001; t=1255016279; x=1256225879; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Francois=20Le=20Faucheur=20<flefauch@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re:=20[tsvwg]=20Attendance=20in=20Hiroshima =20for=20TSVWG?|Date:=20Thu,=208=20Oct=202009=2017:37:56 =20+0200|Message-Id:=20<E66C358E-5453-4A97-BC02-F8407D9E7 D31@cisco.com>|To:=20"James=20M.=20Polk"=20<jmpolk@cisco. com>|Cc:=20Francois=20Le=20Faucheur=20<flefauch@cisco.com >,=20tsvwg=20<tsvwg@ietf.org>|Mime-Version:=201.0=20(Appl e=20Message=20framework=20v1076) |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<XFE-SJ C-2127EjQxzmW00003043@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com> |References:=20<XFE-SJC-2127EjQxzmW00003043@xfe-sjc-212.a mer.cisco.com>; bh=CKpzNiqIcFaHxZgY/M75aLjqFFA/8QBhmDI8stJOIvU=; b=U/k/W3PJzVlXFcp2a79TRky2iLnNFG/o/s3CtM7K48wNJgIOLMJK8zM+ F7H5pTBliYnXF4wINIepIjhQgQYAvOxD/HFuKM0jqYEGLRv6Hk3XUPhD4 fmhxdm1ek5vPykAQGIWioItEzuP8D+2WooEte32iToYvPFQRy6kRlS4bo o=;
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,526,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="51296675"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2009 15:37:57 +0000
Received: from ams-flefauch-8716.cisco.com (ams-flefauch-8716.cisco.com [10.55.161.199]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n98Fbuiw002025; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:37:57 GMT
References: <XFE-SJC-2127EjQxzmW00003043@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-2127EjQxzmW00003043@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Message-Id: <E66C358E-5453-4A97-BC02-F8407D9E7D31@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:37:56 +0200
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Attendance in Hiroshima for TSVWG?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:36:17 -0000

Hi James,

We plan to rev up:
	* RSVP Proxy Approaches
	* RSVP Proxy Protocol
	* hopefully draft-lefaucheur-tsvwg-rsvp-multiple-preemption

Francois

On 6 Oct 2009, at 04:30, James M. Polk wrote:

> WG
>
> As chair -- I'm curious how many authors believe they will have new - 
> tsvwg- IDs or IDs revved for Hiroshima?
>
> I only get the feeling we will have 1 or 2 IDs (or revs) coming, and  
> want to know if I'm not correctly reading the WG.
>
> I'm almost afraid to ask who will (or who normally attends and  
> won't) be attending this IETF...
>
> James
> (with my chair hat on)
>