[tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-01
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> Wed, 10 July 2013 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2ED11E80DF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.93
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.93 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhXXpkBnOqXz for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com (mail-bk0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCFD21F9BD4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id na10so2594814bkb.33 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=wteH0c4qDRo+VCl0O8Sz6zpwOqsvHMN/v7Q7IUetMtk=; b=ETOk6ZIo6V2zsRLfhurFrcn99lUqXenNAPfPcUTy+llt0mrrpKIxBfOcCkJJyB/PFI tH2ab2b3qE8ASwFA+AEFW1l8j9+yCG8S2QZdohzGQyr/ldwhsajg7QqvpKTqCeFk88gP /cyTQ8x2R2+5uB51wYSHAtV7STv5ILRa5hhqAQez9+Vs78X59ti/qCeiCcQaD+o+ZVae /PSdtgsrgZ3joDTq0SNAEAu56LGmRcSqcavoWNdbDjDS5s7an4A+amY9hAnmHISx690k ioDoO5vE+2sNAzDLK0PiSrd2Yiyuxtim6GMBE332jgzZyLR+fFU3aFi4ofC59eCf/Iph ykTQ==
X-Received: by 10.205.34.14 with SMTP id sq14mr4619772bkb.100.1373419372499; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.2.135 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:22:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAFAkD-Kgb34TBC2bDWKVUfF4NNgyWSMzPk1MAU5rUwjkf=4uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org, Salvatore.Loreto@ericsson.com, robin.seggelmann@t-systems.com, randall@lakerest.net, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec51a7c7ad39e5a04e11e1dc5"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzB7u6P3p7flohkqkZwABW1uGg2ld2deq1Yllsc6ssJmP8xf0qDu8DIvSlkR2NVi+U+fzj
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:16:20 -0700
Subject: [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-01
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 01:22:59 -0000
Hi, Looks good. I have an unrelated question since a mention occurs in the sprstat_abandoned_sent stats): does it make sense to abandon a message that is partially sent? At the receiver, I am assuming if such a partial message was to make it, partial delivery will be made to the socket user? cheers, jamal
- [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpolici… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpo… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpo… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpo… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpo… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [tsvwg] comments draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-prpo… Jamal Hadi Salim