IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt

"Ana C. Custura" <ana@netstat.org.uk> Tue, 17 May 2022 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ana@netstat.org.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49931C159828 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2022 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netstat.org.uk header.b=NxchV+4c; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iN2oLoD4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbDSnO03DMan for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2022 07:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF501C14F734 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2022 07:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B19320016F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:36:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap45 ([10.202.2.95]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 17 May 2022 10:36:40 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netstat.org.uk; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1652798199; x=1652884599; bh=e8QgCGXeSB fYBneFNCXMosTQxyc81rvs5DsCF7Ry3Wo=; b=NxchV+4cjSQvhlgT8bMuRn7mhp 5GnYVwrGAadSiPRhn6g7GVwi8qeMv2V4ruZR6mBcQ5Oz2cwRv3xw2EIV49J1KNY5 cW4xOC90y0cruSUmwOaamt9763gMDlAsQl1S5fF7kiLWoKZzHeA7y3eIPyv/MaXS CMINlXDacXVzJh64PmqWrLjwjjac31DRdWwIvbwXs3lo+3BblKubk0eEateXfQgj XeRMQF6xcvDQ0QgXom9DbuIm3/0HgNAArwyF4sRi41OvGvXnRENRjhsuu8e7CZUp INSnBsu7ti7s/2bOXOZmcsrzn/wzfXyqzTH4lPBf8ok0D8KWE/T5pFflyrkg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1652798199; x=1652884599; bh=e8QgCGXeSBfYBneFNCXMosTQxyc8 1rvs5DsCF7Ry3Wo=; b=iN2oLoD4pGnvslO/Lm3tnuy6WgAHi729gLMhdrPO6gqm cP16spYBp2SaHq1UcS2O8LWnouA5P1YCjF4UrstheY9YsfFnuZvCy3LCiaQofwbZ G1H9O6xl4LInuTwON/qDrCndZSr1JMd/mLVGVIyzIxkUBpTX0kkmxM442lbX9ezw 9Iqyvuk+zB4bi+5LnwyDp9agCVPbsYuycVx9hlhhNxVlAy8178bQZfBzTokrPXvk sdLvWV3ZVHJDA/jszWACrta48ybnzZnurBmDs6v0mqD/1qHhc06AsUkvI2DMFpi1 BMFbeYyKmChD9P/RRK88x38vw5YK0VReK/13xXBbig==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:97KDYvtD6FR5ph_y1dBML6J6lhc7hWdNlQqoL0gP6l3LxU9GyrhRMA> <xme:97KDYgeQUnHpwXcdjR7RxmU8IBToefTM8t7Eroj-QHSri8l5ac7EYpfrkJQr0THkO 2wWc7CSrE6NkwX4pg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrheejgdejhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdetnhgrucevrdcuvehushhtuhhrrgdfuceorghnrgesnhgv thhsthgrthdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuvefhfeelffdtudelke egieejhfeigfeihfdvffehgeelveeltdeguefgudfhheenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhf rdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh eprghnrgesnhgvthhsthgrthdrohhrghdruhhk
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:97KDYiz1YT1EKI1W4ZqDqBbvOZva4MytO0vk9L8sa47sGwFJc-EiUg> <xmx:97KDYuNXbpa33YqXLZVkjj9Rhs58RhRwX1bB-9v1_iyejGZVeLMzsg> <xmx:97KDYv8heUtPkGFg3UNyCA1PuCNqiiE_lEokepbb3jBobf-UFEsIWQ> <xmx:97KDYiITwXjxAv8YyLUVO8e_Py3xl-v0BoQl1gazb6EaPSwsMipT2Q>
Feedback-ID: if488437c:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8B5A6272006B; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:36:39 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-591-gfe6c3a2700-fm-20220427.001-gfe6c3a27
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b987d1a6-4b95-4a90-999c-8145a7291ee4@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <165236986178.37941.1006524625237540090@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <165236986178.37941.1006524625237540090@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 15:36:18 +0100
From: "Ana C. Custura" <ana@netstat.org.uk>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/xcsp1Ct10wUfCX4JpRqRk27uZzw>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 14:36:48 -0000

Hi all,

We've updated draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations and think this revision addresses all the comments received so far. In summary, this was changed to:

- Consolidate terminology after IETF 113 Vienna.
- Add clarification to RFC2474 and RFC2475 addressed in RFC3260 (Comments from Ruediger Geib).
- Include figures to show the full list of codepoints, their assigned PHBs & impact of ToS Precedence Bleaching.
- Add network categories that differentiate between network operator approaches to DiffServ.
- Add Terminology section to clarify representations of DSCPs.

Thanks again to everyone who proposed changes, and let us know if we've missed anything.

Regards,
Ana, Gorry & Raffaello

On Thu, May 12, 2022, at 4:37 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Considerations for Assigning a new 
> Recommended DiffServ Codepoint (DSCP)
>         Authors         : Ana Custura
>                           Godred Fairhurst
>                           Raffaello Secchi
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 22
> 	Date            : 2022-05-12
>
> Abstract:
>    This document discusses considerations for assigning a new
>    recommended DiffServ Code Point (DSCP).  It considers the common
>    remarking pathologies that the DiffServ field might be subjected to
>    along an Internet path.  It also notes some implications of using a
>    specific DSCP.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email