Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-09.txt
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mon, 03 July 2023 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26C8C15107D for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 00:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GH9I-G8u9NV0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 00:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04ECEC14CF18 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 00:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.130] (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A44E71B0015B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 08:28:09 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <a9e415b9-8776-7f0e-2e23-c11e70740467@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:28:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <168805849623.15224.18038199673090941440@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACL_3VGH9BZYyJPc5yFzfsbvnaF__Zi6uw55zfoADOV7NvPF8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VGH9BZYyJPc5yFzfsbvnaF__Zi6uw55zfoADOV7NvPF8A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/yS1JqzC6vUY_vaXieCKhtmsXN88>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-09.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 07:28:17 -0000
On 03/07/2023 01:35, C. M. Heard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 1:50 PM PDT, in the thread entitled "Remaining > issues for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-22," Gorry Fairhurst wrote: >> UDP Options itself doesn't generate the response, it passes the REQ >> upwards to the protocol that does and that sends the RES option. > However, Section 3 of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-09 says: > > When DPLPMTUD is within the UDP transport service, the UDP Options > processing is responsible for sending probe packets to determine a > PLPMTU, as described in this document. > > It might be better to say "the DPLPMTUD State Machine" rather than "the > UDP Options processing" to make it clear that it is the shim above UDP > Options Transport in the figure that does this, and not UDP Options > itself. This would help to emphasize the point that UDP Options on its > own does not generate responses to any option. Yes, that is better, added. > > The document does not describe in detail what happens when an Upper > Layer Protocol (or application) implements DLPMTUD using UDP options. > For me. it's easy enough to infer that the DPLPMTUD State Machine has to > reside within the application, and that the application must initiate > the actions to generate probe packets and responses. However, a sentence > making that point explicit would not hurt. It's the application/library/protocol/ or whatever uses the UDP Options, I tried to improve that in the Editor's version. > > Thanks and regards, > > Mike Heard Gorry > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:08 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working >> Group (TSVWG) WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options >> Authors : Godred Fairhurst >> Tom Jones >> Filename : draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-09.txt >> Pages : 17 >> Date : 2023-06-29 >> >> Abstract: >> This document specifies how a UDP Options sender implements Datagram >> Packetization Layer Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery >> (DPLPMTUD) as a robust method for Path Maximum Transmission Unit >> discovery. This method uses the UDP Options packetization layer. It >> allows an application to discover the largest size of datagram that >> can be sent across the network path. It also provides a way to allow >> the application to periodically verify the current maximum packet >> size supported by a path and to update this when required. >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud/ >> >> There is also an htmlized version available at: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-09 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-09 >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >>
- [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-… internet-drafts
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… Erik Auerswald
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… Erik Auerswald
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… C. M. Heard
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… Gorry Fairhurst