BigTen addressing drafts
Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Fri, 10 June 1994 16:16 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05052; 10 Jun 94 12:16 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05048; 10 Jun 94 12:16 EDT
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13432; 10 Jun 94 12:16 EDT
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id KAA27301; Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:16:14 -0600
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id KAA16652; Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:15:20 -0600
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id KAA16649; Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:15:19 -0600
Received: from lager.cisco.com by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id KAA27224; Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:15:18 -0600
Received: (tli@localhost) by lager.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) id CAA16420; Fri, 10 Jun 1994 02:19:03 -0700
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 02:19:03 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199406100919.CAA16420@lager.cisco.com>
To: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Cc: SIPP Mailing list <sipp@sunroof2.eng.sun.com>, tuba@lanl.gov, tli@cisco.com, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Reply-To: big-internet@munnari.oz.au, tli@cisco.com, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Subject: BigTen addressing drafts
Folks, As part of the IPng Directorate meeting May 19 & 20 in Chicago, the Directorate and its guests had a general discussion of alternative designs. Discussion focused around a hypothetical proposal which, for the lack of a better name, we call BigTen, after the conference center where the meeting was held. One of the more interesting features about BigTen is that it does use variable length addresses in a way unlike any of the current proposals. Subsequent to the meeting, Yakov and I were asked by the area directors to look into an addressing architecture and plan for such addresses. These documents are now available as Internet drafts: draft-rekhter-bigten-addr-arch-00.txt draft-li-bigten-addr-format-00.txt Please note that these are CRUDE first drafts subject to major revisions. For example, it's not clear if the length bits should have routing significance. Please direct any comments to Yakov and myself. Public discussion should occur on the big-internet mailing list. Thanks, Tony
- BigTen addressing drafts Tony Li
- BigTen addressing drafts Tony Li